From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/13] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99208409-87d4-4ed2-8294-665eafd60b47@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tt7rsreu.fsf@gmail.com>
On 17/03/2025 13:44, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> if (flags & IOMAP_DAX)
>> iomap->dax_dev = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_daxdev;
>> else
>> @@ -3467,7 +3470,7 @@ static inline bool ext4_want_directio_fallback(unsigned flags, ssize_t written)
>> return false;
>>
>> /* atomic writes are all-or-nothing */
>> - if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW)
>> + if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
>> return false;
>>
> The changes in ext4 is mostly straight forward. Essentially for
> an IOMAP_ATOMIC write requests we are always setting IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO in
> the ->iomap_begin() routine. This is done to inform the iomap that this
> write request needs to issue an atomic bio, so iomap then goes and sets
> REQ_ATOMIC flag in the bio.
Right
>
>
>> /* can only try again if we wrote nothing */
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> index 9d72b99cb447..c28685fd3362 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
>> if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
>> bio_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
>>
>> - if (iter->flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW) {
>> + if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO) {
>> /*
>> * Ensure that the mapping covers the full write length,
>> * otherwise we will submit multiple BIOs, which is
>> @@ -677,10 +677,8 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>> iomi.flags |= IOMAP_OVERWRITE_ONLY;
>> }
>>
>> - if (dio_flags & IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_SW)
>> - iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW;
>> - else if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
>> - iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW;
>> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
>> + iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC;
>>
>> /* for data sync or sync, we need sync completion processing */
>> if (iocb_is_dsync(iocb)) {
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/trace.h b/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> index 69af89044ebd..9eab2c8ac3c5 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ DEFINE_RANGE_EVENT(iomap_dio_rw_queued);
>> { IOMAP_FAULT, "FAULT" }, \
>> { IOMAP_DIRECT, "DIRECT" }, \
>> { IOMAP_NOWAIT, "NOWAIT" }, \
>> - { IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW, "ATOMIC_HW" }
>> + { IOMAP_ATOMIC, "ATOMIC" }
>>
>> #define IOMAP_F_FLAGS_STRINGS \
>> { IOMAP_F_NEW, "NEW" }, \
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> index 30e257f683bb..9a22ecd794eb 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> @@ -831,6 +831,9 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>> if (offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
>> iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
>>
>> + if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
>> + iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO;
>> +
>> /*
>> * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
>> * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> index 9cd93530013c..51f4c13bd17a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct vm_fault;
>> * IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE indicates that (write) I/O does not have a target block
>> * assigned to it yet and the file system will do that in the bio submission
>> * handler, splitting the I/O as needed.
>> + *
>> + * IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO indicates that (write) I/O needs to be issued as an
>> + * atomic bio, i.e. set REQ_ATOMIC.
>> */
>
> Maybe we can be more explicit here?
>
> IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO flag indicates that write I/O must be issued as an
> atomic bio by setting the REQ_ATOMIC flag. Filesystems need to set this
> flag to inform iomap that the write I/O operation should be submitted as
> an atomic bio.
The comment for all these flags is that they should be set by the FS:
"Flags reported by the file system from iomap_begin"
So the second sentence seems to just repeat what is already said.
>
> This definition (or whatever you feel is the better version), should also
> go in Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
Yes, I need to update that again
>
>> #define IOMAP_F_NEW (1U << 0)
>> #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY (1U << 1)
>> @@ -73,6 +76,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
>> #define IOMAP_F_XATTR (1U << 5)
>> #define IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY (1U << 6)
>> #define IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE (1U << 7)
>> +#define IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO (1U << 8)
>>
>> /*
>> * Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
>> @@ -189,9 +193,8 @@ struct iomap_folio_ops {
>> #else
>> #define IOMAP_DAX 0
>> #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
>> -#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW (1 << 9) /* HW-based torn-write protection */
>> +#define IOMAP_ATOMIC (1 << 9) /* torn-write protection */
>> #define IOMAP_DONTCACHE (1 << 10)
>> -#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW (1 << 11)/* SW-based torn-write protection */
> Now that we are killing separate IOMAP_ATOMIC_** names, we may would
> like to update the iomap design document as well. Otherwise it will
> carry use of IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW & IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW definitions. Instead we
> should only keep IOMAP_ATOMIC and update the design info there.
Yes, I will update it.
Thanks for the reminder.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 17:12 [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-03-13 17:12 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] iomap: inline iomap_dio_bio_opflags() John Garry
2025-03-16 13:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] iomap: comment on atomic write checks in iomap_dio_bio_iter() John Garry
2025-03-17 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 8:22 ` John Garry
2025-03-17 14:16 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags John Garry
2025-03-17 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:05 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 8:11 ` John Garry
2025-03-17 13:44 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 14:25 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] xfs: pass flags to xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() John Garry
2025-03-17 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:17 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 8:12 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-03-17 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] xfs: switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-03-17 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:17 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-03-17 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] xfs: reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-17 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] xfs: add XFS_REFLINK_ALLOC_EXTSZALIGN John Garry
2025-03-13 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-17 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] xfs: iomap COW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-16 6:53 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 8:54 ` John Garry
2025-03-17 14:20 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 14:56 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 10:18 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 8:22 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 17:44 ` John Garry
2025-03-19 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-19 10:24 ` John Garry
2025-03-20 5:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 9:49 ` John Garry
2025-03-20 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-03-17 6:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:36 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 8:42 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 8:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 9:12 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-03-17 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:43 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] xfs: update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-03-17 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 9:57 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 5:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 8:44 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99208409-87d4-4ed2-8294-665eafd60b47@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox