public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/13] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:25:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99208409-87d4-4ed2-8294-665eafd60b47@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tt7rsreu.fsf@gmail.com>

On 17/03/2025 13:44, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>>   	if (flags & IOMAP_DAX)
>>   		iomap->dax_dev = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_daxdev;
>>   	else
>> @@ -3467,7 +3470,7 @@ static inline bool ext4_want_directio_fallback(unsigned flags, ssize_t written)
>>   		return false;
>>   
>>   	/* atomic writes are all-or-nothing */
>> -	if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW)
>> +	if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
>>   		return false;
>>   
> The changes in ext4 is mostly straight forward. Essentially for
> an IOMAP_ATOMIC write requests we are always setting IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO in
> the ->iomap_begin() routine. This is done to inform the iomap that this
> write request needs to issue an atomic bio, so iomap then goes and sets
> REQ_ATOMIC flag in the bio.

Right

> 
> 
>>   	/* can only try again if we wrote nothing */
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> index 9d72b99cb447..c28685fd3362 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
>>   	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
>>   		bio_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
>>   
>> -		if (iter->flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW) {
>> +		if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO) {
>>   			/*
>>   			* Ensure that the mapping covers the full write length,
>>   			* otherwise we will submit multiple BIOs, which is
>> @@ -677,10 +677,8 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>>   			iomi.flags |= IOMAP_OVERWRITE_ONLY;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		if (dio_flags & IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_SW)
>> -			iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW;
>> -		else if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
>> -			iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW;
>> +		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
>> +			iomi.flags |= IOMAP_ATOMIC;
>>   
>>   		/* for data sync or sync, we need sync completion processing */
>>   		if (iocb_is_dsync(iocb)) {
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/trace.h b/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> index 69af89044ebd..9eab2c8ac3c5 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/trace.h
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ DEFINE_RANGE_EVENT(iomap_dio_rw_queued);
>>   	{ IOMAP_FAULT,		"FAULT" }, \
>>   	{ IOMAP_DIRECT,		"DIRECT" }, \
>>   	{ IOMAP_NOWAIT,		"NOWAIT" }, \
>> -	{ IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW,	"ATOMIC_HW" }
>> +	{ IOMAP_ATOMIC,		"ATOMIC" }
>>   
>>   #define IOMAP_F_FLAGS_STRINGS \
>>   	{ IOMAP_F_NEW,		"NEW" }, \
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> index 30e257f683bb..9a22ecd794eb 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> @@ -831,6 +831,9 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>>   	if (offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
>>   		iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
>>   
>> +	if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
>> +		iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO;
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
>>   	 * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> index 9cd93530013c..51f4c13bd17a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct vm_fault;
>>    * IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE indicates that (write) I/O does not have a target block
>>    * assigned to it yet and the file system will do that in the bio submission
>>    * handler, splitting the I/O as needed.
>> + *
>> + * IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO indicates that (write) I/O needs to be issued as an
>> + * atomic bio, i.e. set REQ_ATOMIC.
>>    */
> 
> Maybe we can be more explicit here?
> 
> IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO flag indicates that write I/O must be issued as an
> atomic bio by setting the REQ_ATOMIC flag. Filesystems need to set this
> flag to inform iomap that the write I/O operation should be submitted as
> an atomic bio.

The comment for all these flags is that they should be set by the FS:

"Flags reported by the file system from iomap_begin"

So the second sentence seems to just repeat what is already said.


> 
> This definition (or whatever you feel is the better version), should also
> go in Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst

Yes, I need to update that again

> 
>>   #define IOMAP_F_NEW		(1U << 0)
>>   #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY		(1U << 1)
>> @@ -73,6 +76,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
>>   #define IOMAP_F_XATTR		(1U << 5)
>>   #define IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY	(1U << 6)
>>   #define IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE	(1U << 7)
>> +#define IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO	(1U << 8)
>>   
>>   /*
>>    * Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
>> @@ -189,9 +193,8 @@ struct iomap_folio_ops {
>>   #else
>>   #define IOMAP_DAX		0
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
>> -#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW		(1 << 9) /* HW-based torn-write protection */
>> +#define IOMAP_ATOMIC		(1 << 9) /* torn-write protection */
>>   #define IOMAP_DONTCACHE		(1 << 10)
>> -#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW		(1 << 11)/* SW-based torn-write protection */
> Now that we are killing separate IOMAP_ATOMIC_** names, we may would
> like to update the iomap design document as well. Otherwise it will
> carry use of IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW & IOMAP_ATOMIC_SW definitions. Instead we
> should only keep IOMAP_ATOMIC and update the design info there.

Yes, I will update it.

Thanks for the reminder.

John


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-13 17:12 [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-03-13 17:12 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] iomap: inline iomap_dio_bio_opflags() John Garry
2025-03-16 13:40   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] iomap: comment on atomic write checks in iomap_dio_bio_iter() John Garry
2025-03-17  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  8:22     ` John Garry
2025-03-17 14:16   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags John Garry
2025-03-17  6:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:05     ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  8:11         ` John Garry
2025-03-17 13:44   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 14:25     ` John Garry [this message]
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] xfs: pass flags to xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() John Garry
2025-03-17  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:17     ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  8:12         ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-03-17  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] xfs: switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-03-17  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:17     ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-03-17  6:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] xfs: reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-17  6:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] xfs: add XFS_REFLINK_ALLOC_EXTSZALIGN John Garry
2025-03-13 18:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-17  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] xfs: iomap COW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-16  6:53   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17  8:54     ` John Garry
2025-03-17 14:20       ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-17 14:56         ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:35           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  7:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 10:18     ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  8:22         ` John Garry
2025-03-18  8:32           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 17:44             ` John Garry
2025-03-19  7:30               ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-19 10:24                 ` John Garry
2025-03-20  5:29                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20  9:49                     ` John Garry
2025-03-20 14:12                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-03-17  6:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:36     ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:43       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  8:42         ` John Garry
2025-03-18  8:46           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  9:12             ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-03-17  6:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:43     ` John Garry
2025-03-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] xfs: update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-03-17  7:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17  9:57     ` John Garry
2025-03-18  5:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  5:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  8:44   ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99208409-87d4-4ed2-8294-665eafd60b47@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox