From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8SIqlAU255396 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:52:48 -0500 Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 83FABAEA58 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 2TpVACeoJ2PHq7FA for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI04.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.24]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8SIrgSF025242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:43 -0400 Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.253]) by hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:38 -0400 Received: from corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com [10.254.169.197]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8SIrK0p015364 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:20 -0400 From: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:46 -0400 Subject: allocsize mount option Message-ID: Content-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Timothy.Heath@emc.com Hi all, According to the documentation the allocsize mount option: "Sets the buffered I/O end-of-file preallocation size when doing delayed allocation writeout" Will this value limit "extent" sizes to be be no smaller than the allocsize? I have set the following mount options: (rw,noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8,allocsize=512m) And yet, depending on the workload, the extent sizes are often 1 or 2 orders of magnitude lower than 512 MB ... If I wanted to do further reading on the subject, can someone point me to an approximate location in the code where the size of a newly created extent is determined? Cheers, Ivan Novick _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs