From: Jayashree Mohan <jayashree2912@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Vijaychidambaram Velayudhan Pillai <vijay@cs.utexas.edu>,
Ashlie Martinez <ashmrtn@utexas.edu>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XFS crash consistency bug : Loss of fsynced metadata operation
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:05:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EzBbDXWPFiOzL1T+LDFo11SzUYoVVBRW462PWDB8F+JHQmUg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxgWuS-=mR8+_+vHMkD7szrXTgnnMPtbx2nj88-MgzLa9w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Amir,
We reported these bugs separately on the two mailing lists because,
though the workload was the same, the behavior/bug was different on
the two filesystems. On ext4 there was data loss, while on xfs the
fzero operation was not persisted even after a fsync.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the exact same report was sent to the ext4 list, CC'ing Dave's response to
> Ted and fstests, which seems an appropriate crowd for this discussion.
> I think that future CrashMonkey findings should be CC'ed to either fsdevel
> or fstests, especially if more than one filesystem is affected.
Thanks for the suggestion. We will CC our future reports to these lists.
Thanks,
Jayashree
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 2:15 XFS crash consistency bug : Loss of fsynced metadata operation Jayashree Mohan
2018-03-13 4:21 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-13 6:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-13 18:05 ` Jayashree Mohan [this message]
2018-03-13 16:57 ` Jayashree Mohan
2018-03-13 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-14 13:16 ` Lukas Czerner
2018-03-14 13:32 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-14 13:57 ` Lukas Czerner
2018-03-14 21:24 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-15 6:15 ` Lukas Czerner
2018-03-15 10:06 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-15 10:32 ` Lukas Czerner
2018-03-16 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-16 5:45 ` Lukas Czerner
2018-03-17 3:16 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+EzBbDXWPFiOzL1T+LDFo11SzUYoVVBRW462PWDB8F+JHQmUg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jayashree2912@gmail.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ashmrtn@utexas.edu \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vijay@cs.utexas.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).