From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qt0-f196.google.com ([209.85.216.196]:51378 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751234AbdKMMkx (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:40:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711131324170.1851@nanos>
References: <20171112192142.525567667@linutronix.de> <CAFGhKbyJheVH-qrh3jYfWyTjSzFeY2yUJGYuscqLQf+SsvEzqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711131324170.1851@nanos>
From: Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:40:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFGhKbz3XRxjk85aj80Hy7BQ7gf5zLkfSdmJioXwAs+Zxi7nZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to
 properly identify file licenses
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>, Jonas Oberg <jonas@fsfe.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>, Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@fsfe.org>

2017-11-13 13:26 GMT+01:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:
>> > +If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the
>> > +appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used.
>>
>> Most of the things sound good. But I really don't get the first-line
>> thing and the C++ single line comments in C sources.
>
> That's been a decision from Linus and probably not going to change, even if
> you argue in circles.

I always thought that Linus is the person reponsible for unfriendly
responses. But ok, when it is not wanted to discuss anything then please
ignore me.

Thanks,
Charlemagne Lasse