public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: allison.henderson@oracle.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/27] xfs: Add new name to attri/d
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:09:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1g0cp2c3k240r4P@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021222936.934426-2-allison.henderson@oracle.com>

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 03:29:10PM -0700, allison.henderson@oracle.com wrote:
> From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> 
> This patch adds two new fields to the atti/d.  They are nname and
> nnamelen.  This will be used for parent pointer updates since a
> rename operation may cause the parent pointer to update both the
> name and value.  So we need to carry both the new name as well as
> the target name in the attri/d.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c       |  12 +++-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h       |   4 +-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.h   |   2 +
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h |   6 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c         | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.h         |   1 +
>  6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

<snip all the way to the one thing I noticed>

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> index cf5ce607dc05..0c449fb606ed 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> @@ -731,10 +767,41 @@ xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2(

Ahahaha this function.  Could you review this patch that strengthens the
length checking on the incoming recovery item buffers, please?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/166664715731.2688790.9836328662603103847.stgit@magnolia/

>  	struct xfs_attri_log_nameval	*nv;
>  	const void			*attr_value = NULL;
>  	const void			*attr_name;
> -	int                             error;
> +	const void			*attr_nname = NULL;
> +	int				i = 0;
> +	int                             op, error = 0;
>  
> -	attri_formatp = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
> -	attr_name = item->ri_buf[1].i_addr;
> +	if (item->ri_total == 0) {

Do all the log intent item types need to check for a nonzero number of
recovery item buffers too?  I /think/ this is unnecessary because
xlog_recover_add_to_trans will abort recovery if ilf_size == 0, and
ri_total is assigned to ilf_size:

	if (item->ri_total == 0) {	/* first region to be added */
		if (in_f->ilf_size == 0 ||
		    in_f->ilf_size > XLOG_MAX_REGIONS_IN_ITEM) {
			xfs_warn(log->l_mp,
		"bad number of regions (%d) in inode log format",
				  in_f->ilf_size);
			ASSERT(0);
			kmem_free(ptr);
			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
		}

		item->ri_total = in_f->ilf_size;

Hm?

> +		XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
> +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +	}
> +
> +	attri_formatp = item->ri_buf[i].i_addr;
> +	i++;
> +
> +	op = attri_formatp->alfi_op_flags & XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_TYPE_MASK;
> +	switch (op) {
> +	case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_SET:
> +	case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_REPLACE:
> +		if (item->ri_total != 3)
> +			error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		break;
> +	case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_REMOVE:
> +		if (item->ri_total != 2)
> +			error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		break;
> +	case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_NVREPLACE:
> +		if (item->ri_total != 4)
> +			error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (error) {
> +		XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);

XFS_ERROR_REPORT is a macro encodes the exact instruction pointer
location in the error report that it emits.  I know it'll make the code
more verbose, but the macros should be embedded in that switch statement
above.

> +		return error;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Validate xfs_attri_log_format before the large memory allocation */
>  	if (!xfs_attri_validate(mp, attri_formatp)) {
> @@ -742,13 +809,27 @@ xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2(
>  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>  	}
>  
> +	attr_name = item->ri_buf[i].i_addr;
> +	i++;
> +
>  	if (!xfs_attr_namecheck(attr_name, attri_formatp->alfi_name_len)) {
>  		XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
>  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (attri_formatp->alfi_nname_len) {

This needs to check that the length of the new name iovec buffer is what
we're expecting:

	if (item->ri_buf[i].i_len !=
			xlog_calc_iovec_len(attri_formatp->alfi_nname_len)) {
		/* complain... */
	}

--D

> +		attr_nname = item->ri_buf[i].i_addr;
> +		i++;
> +
> +		if (!xfs_attr_namecheck(attr_nname,
> +				attri_formatp->alfi_nname_len)) {
> +			XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
> +			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	if (attri_formatp->alfi_value_len)
> -		attr_value = item->ri_buf[2].i_addr;
> +		attr_value = item->ri_buf[i].i_addr;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Memory alloc failure will cause replay to abort.  We attach the
> @@ -756,7 +837,8 @@ xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2(
>  	 * reference.
>  	 */
>  	nv = xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(attr_name,
> -			attri_formatp->alfi_name_len, attr_value,
> +			attri_formatp->alfi_name_len, attr_nname,
> +			attri_formatp->alfi_nname_len, attr_value,
>  			attri_formatp->alfi_value_len);
>  
>  	attrip = xfs_attri_init(mp, nv);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.h
> index 3280a7930287..24d4968dd6cc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct kmem_zone;
>  
>  struct xfs_attri_log_nameval {
>  	struct xfs_log_iovec	name;
> +	struct xfs_log_iovec	nname;
>  	struct xfs_log_iovec	value;
>  	refcount_t		refcount;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 22:29 [PATCH v4 00/27] Parent Pointers allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] xfs: Add new name to attri/d allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:09   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] xfs: Increase XFS_DEFER_OPS_NR_INODES to 5 allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:52   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_ialloc allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:54   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_trans_alloc_dir allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:56   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:59   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] xfs: Expose init_xattrs in xfs_create_tmpfile allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-25 21:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40       ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] xfs: get directory offset when adding directory name allison.henderson
2022-10-28  2:02   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] xfs: get directory offset when removing " allison.henderson
2022-10-28  2:06   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] xfs: get directory offset when replacing a " allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] xfs: add parent pointer support to attribute code allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] xfs: define parent pointer xattr format allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] xfs: Add xfs_verify_pptr allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] xfs: Increase rename inode reservation allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] xfs: extend transaction reservations for parent attributes allison.henderson
2022-10-25 20:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] xfs: parent pointer attribute creation allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] xfs: add parent attributes to link allison.henderson
2022-10-25 20:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] xfs: add parent attributes to symlink allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] xfs: remove parent pointers in unlink allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] xfs: Add parent pointers to xfs_cross_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] xfs: Indent xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] xfs: Add parent pointers to rename allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] xfs: Add the parent pointer support to the superblock version 5 allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] xfs: Add helper function xfs_attr_list_context_init allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] xfs: Filter XFS_ATTR_PARENT for getfattr allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] xfs: Add parent pointer ioctl allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] xfs: fix unit conversion error in xfs_log_calc_max_attrsetm_res allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] xfs: drop compatibility minimum log size computations for reflink allison.henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1g0cp2c3k240r4P@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox