From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] xfs: add fs-verity support
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:13:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5jc7P1ZeWHiTKRF@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5jQ9+L9u2oTc+O/@magnolia>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:22:31AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:08:45AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> > >
> > > Also add check that block size == PAGE_SIZE as fs-verity doesn't
> > > support different sizes yet.
> >
> > That's coming with
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20221028224539.171818-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u,
> > which I'll be resending soon and I hope to apply for 6.3.
> > Review and testing of that patchset, along with its associated xfstests update
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20221211070704.341481-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u),
> > would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Note, as proposed there will still be a limit of:
> >
> > merkle_tree_block_size <= fs_block_size <= page_size
> >
> > Hopefully you don't need fs_block_size > page_size or
>
> Not right this second, but large folios (and the ability to demand them)
> are probably the last major piece that we need to support running
> 64k-fsblock filesystems on x86.
>
> > merkle_tree_block_size > fs_block_size?
>
> Doubtful.
>
Thanks for the info. Actually, I think
merkle_tree_block_size <= fs_block_size <= page_size
is wrong. It should actually be
merkle_tree_block_size <= min(fs_block_size, page_size)
So there shouldn't actually be a problem with fs_block_size > page_size
(assuming that the filesystem doesn't have unrelated problems with it).
merkle_tree_block_size <= page_size comes from the way that fs/verity/verify.c
works (again, talking about the version with my patchset "fsverity: support for
non-4K pages" applied, and not the current upstream version which has a stronger
assumption of merkle_tree_block_size == page_size).
merkle_tree_block_size <= fs_block_size comes from the fact that every time data
is verified, it must be Merkle tree block aligned. Maybe even that is not
necessarily a problem, if the filesystem waits to collect a full page (or folio)
before verifying it. But ext4 will do a FS block at a time.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 17:29 [RFC PATCH 00/11] fs-verity support for XFS Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] xfs: enable large folios in xfs_setup_inode() Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 0:53 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] pagemap: add mapping_clear_large_folios() wrapper Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-12-13 19:33 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-13 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-14 6:52 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-14 8:12 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2023-01-09 16:34 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] xfs: add attribute type for fs-verity Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-12-14 1:03 ` Dave Chinner
2023-01-09 16:37 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] xfs: add fs-verity ro-compat flag Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] xfs: add inode on-disk VERITY flag Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 1:29 ` Dave Chinner
2023-01-09 16:51 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] xfs: initialize fs-verity on file open and cleanup on inode destruction Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 1:35 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-14 5:25 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-14 8:18 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] xfs: disable direct read path for fs-verity sealed files Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 2:07 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-14 5:44 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-23 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-09 17:23 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] xfs: don't enable large folios on fs-verity sealed inode Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 2:07 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] iomap: fs-verity verification on page read Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 19:02 ` Eric Biggers
2023-01-09 16:58 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-14 5:43 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] xfs: add fs-verity support Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 19:08 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-13 19:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-12-13 20:13 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-12-13 20:33 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 20:39 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-13 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-14 7:58 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-13 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] xfs: add fs-verity ioctls Andrey Albershteyn
2022-12-13 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] fs-verity support for XFS Eric Biggers
2022-12-13 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-14 6:31 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-14 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-15 6:47 ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-15 20:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-12-16 5:04 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5jc7P1ZeWHiTKRF@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox