public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs/178: fix mkfs success test
Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 23:54:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKFANr4Yki6+cBmk@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162078494495.3302755.13327851823592717788.stgit@magnolia>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> Fix the obviously incorrect code here that wants to fail the test if
> mkfs doesn't succeed.  The return value ("$?") is always the status of
> the /last/ command in the pipe.  Change the checker to _notrun so that
> we don't leave the scratch check files around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/178 |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/178 b/tests/xfs/178
> index a24ef50c..bf72e640 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/178
> +++ b/tests/xfs/178
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ _supported_fs xfs
>  #             fix filesystem, new mkfs.xfs will be fine.
>  
>  _require_scratch
> -_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs \
> -        || _fail "mkfs failed!"
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs
> +test "${PIPESTATUS[0]}" -eq 0 || _notrun "mkfs failed!"

I still don't understand why changing this to _notrun, shouldn't creating a
default filesystem should always pass? and fail the test if mkfs failed?

Thanks,
Eryu

>  
>  # By executing the followint tmp file, will get on the mkfs options stored in
>  # variables
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-16 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  2:01 [PATCHSET 0/8] fstests: miscellaneous fixes Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs/122: add entries for structures added to 5.13 Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] common/xfs: refactor commands to select a particular xfs backing device Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-16 15:49   ` Eryu Guan
2021-05-16 20:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19  3:03       ` Eryu Guan
2021-05-19 20:46         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: fix old fuzz test invocations of xfs_repair Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs/117: fix fragility in this fuzz test Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] common: always pass -f to $DUMP_COMPRESSOR Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] fsx/fsstress: round blocksize properly Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] fsx: fix backwards parameters in complaint about overly long copy Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-12  2:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs/178: fix mkfs success test Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-16 15:54   ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2021-05-19 23:20     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-16 15:58 ` [PATCHSET 0/8] fstests: miscellaneous fixes Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKFANr4Yki6+cBmk@desktop \
    --to=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox