public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] xfs: pass a CIL context to xlog_write()
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:23:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMysfdbP19Z7nuYL@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617082617.971602-5-david@fromorbit.com>

> +	/*
> +	 * If we have a CIL context, record the LSN of the iclog we were just
> +	 * granted space to start writing into. If the context doesn't have
> +	 * a start_lsn recorded, then this iclog will contain the start record
> +	 * for the checkpoint. Otherwise this write contains the commit record
> +	 * for the checkpoint.
> +	 */
> +	if (ctx) {
> +		spin_lock(&ctx->cil->xc_push_lock);
> +		if (!ctx->start_lsn)
> +			ctx->start_lsn = be64_to_cpu(iclog->ic_header.h_lsn);
> +		else
> +			ctx->commit_lsn = be64_to_cpu(iclog->ic_header.h_lsn);
> +		spin_unlock(&ctx->cil->xc_push_lock);
> +	}

I have to say that having this cil_ctx specific logic that somehow
reverse eingeer what the callers is doing here seems pretty awkware.
To me the logical interface would be to pass a function pointer and
private data except for the performance penalty of indirect calls.

But to make this somewhat bearable I think you should start with the
above block as a helper implemented in xfs_log_cil.c.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17  8:26 [PATCH 0/8 V2] xfs: log fixes for for-next Dave Chinner
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: add iclog state trace events Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-18 14:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: don't wait on future iclogs when pushing the CIL Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 17:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 21:55     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: move xlog_commit_record to xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 12:57   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 17:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 21:56     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-18 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: pass a CIL context to xlog_write() Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 14:46   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 20:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 22:03     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 22:18       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-18 14:23   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-28  8:58   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor out log write ordering from xlog_cil_push_work() Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 19:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-18 14:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18 22:34       ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: separate out setting CIL context LSNs from xlog_write Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 20:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 22:10     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: attached iclog callbacks in xlog_cil_set_ctx_write_state() Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 20:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 22:20     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17  8:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: order CIL checkpoint start records Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 21:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 22:49     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 18:32 ` [PATCH 0/8 V2] xfs: log fixes for for-next Brian Foster
2021-06-17 19:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 20:06     ` Brian Foster
2021-06-17 20:26       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 23:31         ` Brian Foster
2021-06-17 23:43     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-18 13:08       ` Brian Foster
2021-06-18 13:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18 14:02           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18 22:28           ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-18 22:15         ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-18 22:48 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-19 20:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-20 22:18     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMysfdbP19Z7nuYL@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox