From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, guaneryu@gmail.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs/530: Do not pass block size argument to _scratch_mkfs
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 19:18:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQaC8SrE/pWwu47O@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726170827.GU559212@magnolia>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:08:27AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:13:11PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> > _scratch_do_mkfs constructs a mkfs command line by concatenating the values of
> > 1. $mkfs_cmd
> > 2. $MKFS_OPTIONS
> > 3. $extra_mkfs_options
> >
> > The block size argument passed by xfs/530 to _scratch_mkfs() will cause
> > mkfs.xfs to fail if $MKFS_OPTIONS also has a block size specified. In such a
> > case, _scratch_do_mkfs() will construct and invoke an mkfs command line
> > without including the value of $MKFS_OPTIONS.
> >
> > To prevent such silent failures, this commit removes the block size option
> > that was being explicitly passed to _scratch_mkfs().
Patch looks fine to me, and queued for update.
>
> Yes, that makes sense.
>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
I'm wondering if mkfs.xfs could restore the behavior that allows
re-specified options, and the last specified wins, e.g.
mkfs -t xfs -b 1k -b 2k -f /dev/sda2
and mkfs.xfs didn't report failure but created xfs with 2k blocksize.
This may cause less problems like this patch resolved.
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> --D
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > tests/xfs/530 | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/530 b/tests/xfs/530
> > index 4d168ac5..16dc426c 100755
> > --- a/tests/xfs/530
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/530
> > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ echo "Format and mount rt volume"
> >
> > export USE_EXTERNAL=yes
> > export SCRATCH_RTDEV=$rtdev
> > -_scratch_mkfs -d size=$((1024 * 1024 * 1024)) -b size=${dbsize} \
> > +_scratch_mkfs -d size=$((1024 * 1024 * 1024)) \
> > -r size=${rtextsz},extsize=${rtextsz} >> $seqres.full
> > _try_scratch_mount || _notrun "Couldn't mount fs with synthetic rt volume"
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-01 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-26 6:43 [PATCH 1/3] xfs/530: Do not pass block size argument to _scratch_mkfs Chandan Babu R
2021-07-26 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] common/xfs: Add helpers to obtain reflink/rmapbt status of a filesystem Chandan Babu R
2021-07-26 6:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs/530: Bail out if either of reflink or rmapbt is enabled Chandan Babu R
2021-07-26 17:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-27 4:45 ` Chandan Babu R
2021-07-27 18:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-28 2:35 ` Chandan Babu R
2021-08-01 11:41 ` Eryu Guan
2021-08-01 13:10 ` Eryu Guan
2021-07-26 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs/530: Do not pass block size argument to _scratch_mkfs Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-01 11:18 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQaC8SrE/pWwu47O@desktop \
--to=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox