From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFC1C433EF for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E559160EBB for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231290AbhKFOzA (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:55:00 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:38629 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230527AbhKFOzA (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:55:00 -0400 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1A6EqATv010505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:52:10 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 04B1815C00B9; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:52:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:52:09 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, leah.rumancik@gmail.com Subject: Re: soft lockup in xfs/170 on a file system formatted with -m crc=0 Message-ID: References: <20211106021031.GV24307@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211106021031.GV24307@magnolia> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:10:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:25:05PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Is this a known failure? I can reliably reproduce this soft lockup > > running xfs/170 using "gce-xfstests -c xfs/v4 xfs/170" using > > v5.15-rc4. The xfs/v4 test config formats the file system using -m > > crc=0 with no special mount options. > > > > I've attached the kernel config that I used; it's the standard one > > obtained via "gce-xfstests install-kconfig"[1]. > > Also, uh... 5.15 didn't prove to be a stable testing base (at least not > without a bunch of other patches to kvm, the memory manager, and the > block layer) until 5.15-rc7. Thanks, I haven't had a problem using 5.15-rc4 as a testing base for ext4, so I wasn't aware of that. I just tested xfs/170 on 5.15 final, and it is no longer triggering a soft lockup. Thanks again, - Ted