From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:10:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgMUa2Cdr/QoMTPh@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220123230332.GL59729@dread.disaster.area>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:03:32AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > /* 0xa0 */
> >
> > /* File range alignment needed for best performance, in bytes. */
> > __u32 stx_dio_fpos_align_opt;
>
> This is a common property of both DIO and buffered IO, so no need
> for it to be dio-only property.
>
> __u32 stx_offset_align_optimal;
>
Looking at this more closely: will stx_offset_align_optimal actually be useful,
given that st[x]_blksize already exists?
From the stat(2) and statx(2) man pages:
st_blksize
This field gives the "preferred" block size for efficient
filesystem I/O.
stx_blksize
The "preferred" block size for efficient filesystem I/O. (Writ‐
ing to a file in smaller chunks may cause an inefficient read-
modify-rewrite.)
File offsets aren't explicitly mentioned, but I think it's implied they should
be a multiple of st[x]_blksize, just like the I/O size. Otherwise, the I/O
would obviously require reading/writing partial blocks.
So, the proposed stx_offset_align_optimal field sounds like the same thing to
me. Is there anything I'm misunderstanding?
Putting stx_offset_align_optimal behind the STATX_DIRECTIO flag would also be
confusing if it would apply to both direct and buffered I/O.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-20 7:12 [PATCH v10 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] fscrypt: add functions for direct I/O support Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-20 9:04 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-21 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] iomap: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] ext4: " Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] f2fs: " Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] fscrypt: update documentation for direct I/O support Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 8:30 ` [PATCH v10 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-20 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-20 20:39 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 21:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-20 22:04 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-20 22:48 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 23:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-21 2:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-21 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-23 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2022-02-09 1:10 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-02-10 4:03 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgMUa2Cdr/QoMTPh@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox