From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't assert fail on perag references on teardown
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 20:48:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoxVdipmKR4PHUyH@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524022158.1849458-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:21:57PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Not fatal, the assert is there to catch developer attention. I'm
> seeing this occasionally during recoveryloop testing after a
> shutdown, and I don't want this to stop an overnight recoveryloop
> run as it is currently doing.
>
> Convert the ASSERT to a XFS_IS_CORRUPT() check so it will dump a
> corruption report into the log and cause a test failure that way,
> but it won't stop the machine dead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> index 1e4ee042d52f..3e920cf1b454 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ __xfs_free_perag(
> struct xfs_perag *pag = container_of(head, struct xfs_perag, rcu_head);
>
> ASSERT(!delayed_work_pending(&pag->pag_blockgc_work));
> - ASSERT(atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) == 0);
Er, shouldn't this also be converted to XFS_IS_CORRUPT? That's what the
commit message said...
--D
> kmem_free(pag);
> }
>
> @@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ xfs_free_perag(
> pag = radix_tree_delete(&mp->m_perag_tree, agno);
> spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
> ASSERT(pag);
> - ASSERT(atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) == 0);
> + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(pag->pag_mount, atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) != 0);
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pag->pag_blockgc_work);
> xfs_iunlink_destroy(pag);
> --
> 2.35.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 2:21 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: small fixes for 5.19 cycle Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 2:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: avoid unnecessary runtime sibling pointer endian conversions Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 3:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 2:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't assert fail on perag references on teardown Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 3:48 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-05-24 4:00 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 4:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 2:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: assert in xfs_btree_del_cursor should take into account error Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 3:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoxVdipmKR4PHUyH@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox