From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBD7C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 17:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229924AbiFFRm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:42:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35312 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229887AbiFFRm4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:42:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9B6317179 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id w2-20020a17090ac98200b001e0519fe5a8so13136329pjt.4 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Mjf1ioIsO1gM3eJxhXnjKQH66MOn46Rpxg/nM5p4JWA=; b=TM9wjFA4hltgqrC2R/HBL9essAOQwJozlET7nLzd1aygG5uaM6yhPfsGJ72Cnpw4KT lDlieM9yWwrf7UsfAbl2CtDreAiDa/iCPl8REI9Nm8o4/LmrgON8ziw6c+Wcrk3ZLLZx fwDUUdQRVc9bdUQ4kZJih2d4IHtEvhw9G0nGUsg54xqzeQ4EiyA8Ufal7GhyjFz0ulOV PsxYmw7+6GEscdnv2NX2RBon38W/bCw3qpVx0B8mN67meH8qHfNWobfyil5qbbR4yoW+ nI2K5ebG0WibVNDW2K/1OQsWm5s2316rc13jIFhRISDM5XbCzAe1kJUEcVFX5qBQS+sj e4Gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Mjf1ioIsO1gM3eJxhXnjKQH66MOn46Rpxg/nM5p4JWA=; b=LePcrSS3c1fTXa2wOMbc1/u7BewPfQHrOaiu36g1ACvalbSV3kyOxEAUBfR0xr1ALJ f+gvA315AVqVqqaS+IUSZlhCwMDCjO9YXNw70yzixs0AcUbeg3vIOK6vIabAhMO78JAj CPVLHd2WaAacrqI3dSi+xlLRH7gjHKrpId1dBUjSC7yOf3i9IzuM2skL1dInEquUnc8d Y9xVoECAUvuHbFcbRFJ5mIOI1177FbU1EBXYTK4ZBOeW+p2Bx6vJ9RdncmDJsfduIMGc IOe6lmGsQV6tkL99QjHHwppaaDrpyr65tYxAXLrl8tLqJLs+bhheDwQcBWnKq11OyzZK EI0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wu7TvDO9WGOWY57Pw732BV9tMBjNJf6yHiE2ICDabbXSZY7j9 dxS98qxwqjpbJ6nvsRHItMo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi2VuN1Gg4BSFcu0Uu7ajJe7V/IA9BLu3dKdizZa9M4SKNBTxfVMd1KMr68AIWpz0Bjptysg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3c6:b0:1e2:e9fc:4e79 with SMTP id go6-20020a17090b03c600b001e2e9fc4e79mr47650472pjb.192.1654537375101; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:0:1001:7810:60d:5ebb:8c17:f634]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x15-20020a17090a1f8f00b001cd4989fed4sm12810992pja.32.2022.06.06.10.42.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:42:52 -0700 From: Leah Rumancik To: Amir Goldstein Cc: linux-xfs , "Darrick J. Wong" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/15] xfs stable candidate patches for 5.15.y Message-ID: References: <20220603184701.3117780-1-leah.rumancik@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:38:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 6:53 AM Leah Rumancik wrote: > > > > From: Leah Rumancik > > > > This first round of patches aims to take care of the easy cases - patches > > with the Fixes tag that apply cleanly. I have ~30 more patches identified > > which will be tested next, thanks everyone for the various suggestions > > for tracking down more bug fixes. No regressions were seen during > > testing when running fstests 3 times per config with the following configs: > > Hi Leah! > > I'll let the xfs developers comment on the individual patches. > General comments about stable process and collaboration. > > Some of the patches in this series are relevant to 5.10 and even apply > cleanly to 5.10 (see below). > They are in my queue but I did not get to test them thoroughly yet, > because I am working chronologically. > > To avoid misunderstanding with stable maintainers, when you post to > stable, please make sure to state clearly in the cover letter that those > patches have only been tested on 5.15.y and should only be applied > to 5.15.y. > I know you have 5.15 in subject, but I would rather be safe than sorry. Fair concern, will do. > > Luis has advised me to post up to 10 patches in each round. > The rationale is that after we test and patches are applied to stable > regressions may be detected and reported by downstream users. > > Regressions will be easier to bisect if there are less fixes in every > LTS release. For this reason, I am holding on to my part 2 patches > until 5.10.120 is released. LTS releases are usually on weekly basis > so the delay is not much. > > I don't think that this series is terribly big, so I am fine with you > posting it at one go, but please consider splitting it pre 5.16 > and post 5.16 or any other way that you see fit when you post > to stable, but let's wait for xfs developers review - if they tell you to > drop a few patches my comment will become moot ;-) > Sure, that is no problem for me, I'll go ahead and split into sets of 10 or fewer. Thanks for the comments! Leah