From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: track the iunlink list pointer in the xfs_inode
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:50:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yry7GeiLpfBu6/1h@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220627004336.217366-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:43:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Having direct access to the i_next_unlinked pointer in unlinked
> inodes greatly simplifies the processing of inodes on the unlinked
> list. We no longer need to look up the inode buffer just to find
> next inode in the list if the xfs_inode is in memory. These
> improvements will be realised over upcoming patches as other
> dependencies on the inode buffer for unlinked list processing are
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Pretty straightforward
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 3 ++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 5 ++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 3 +++
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 16 +---------------
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index 3b1b63f9d886..d05a3294020a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk(
> ip->i_nblocks = be64_to_cpu(from->di_nblocks);
> ip->i_extsize = be32_to_cpu(from->di_extsize);
> ip->i_forkoff = from->di_forkoff;
> - ip->i_diflags = be16_to_cpu(from->di_flags);
> + ip->i_diflags = be16_to_cpu(from->di_flags);
> + ip->i_next_unlinked = be32_to_cpu(from->di_next_unlinked);
>
> if (from->di_dmevmask || from->di_dmstate)
> xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IPRESERVE_DM_FIELDS);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 2a371c3431c9..c507370bd885 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -2098,7 +2098,8 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_inode(
>
> /* Make sure the old pointer isn't garbage. */
> old_value = be32_to_cpu(dip->di_next_unlinked);
> - if (!xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, pag->pag_agno, old_value)) {
> + if (old_value != ip->i_next_unlinked ||
> + !xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, pag->pag_agno, old_value)) {
> xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__, dip,
> sizeof(*dip), __this_address);
> error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> @@ -2167,6 +2168,7 @@ xfs_iunlink_insert_inode(
> if (error)
> return error;
> ASSERT(old_agino == NULLAGINO);
> + ip->i_next_unlinked = next_agino;
>
> /*
> * agino has been unlinked, add a backref from the next inode
> @@ -2366,6 +2368,7 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
> error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, pag, NULLAGINO, &next_agino);
> if (error)
> return error;
> + ip->i_next_unlinked = NULLAGINO;
>
> /*
> * If there was a backref pointing from the next inode back to this
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index 7be6f8e705ab..8e2a33c6cbe2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
> uint64_t i_diflags2; /* XFS_DIFLAG2_... */
> struct timespec64 i_crtime; /* time created */
>
> + /* unlinked list pointers */
> + xfs_agino_t i_next_unlinked;
> +
> /* VFS inode */
> struct inode i_vnode; /* embedded VFS inode */
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index 5f7e4e6e33ce..f360b46533a6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -2673,8 +2673,6 @@ xlog_recover_process_one_iunlink(
> xfs_agino_t agino,
> int bucket)
> {
> - struct xfs_buf *ibp;
> - struct xfs_dinode *dip;
> struct xfs_inode *ip;
> xfs_ino_t ino;
> int error;
> @@ -2684,27 +2682,15 @@ xlog_recover_process_one_iunlink(
> if (error)
> goto fail;
>
> - /*
> - * Get the on disk inode to find the next inode in the bucket.
> - */
> - error = xfs_imap_to_bp(mp, NULL, &ip->i_imap, &ibp);
> - if (error)
> - goto fail_iput;
> - dip = xfs_buf_offset(ibp, ip->i_imap.im_boffset);
> -
> xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_IRECOVERY);
> ASSERT(VFS_I(ip)->i_nlink == 0);
> ASSERT(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode != 0);
>
> /* setup for the next pass */
> - agino = be32_to_cpu(dip->di_next_unlinked);
> - xfs_buf_relse(ibp);
> -
> + agino = ip->i_next_unlinked;
> xfs_irele(ip);
> return agino;
>
> - fail_iput:
> - xfs_irele(ip);
> fail:
> /*
> * We can't read in the inode this bucket points to, or this inode
> --
> 2.36.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-27 0:43 [PATCH 0/9 v3] xfs: in-memory iunlink items Dave Chinner
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 20:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: track the iunlink list pointer in the xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_process_iunlinks() Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 20:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: introduce xfs_iunlink_lookup Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 21:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: double link the unlinked inode list Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 20:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 21:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: clean up xfs_iunlink_update_inode() Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 21:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 21:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 21:48 ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 2:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-29 21:37 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 21:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 21:44 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 21:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-07 23:43 [PATCH 0/9 v4] xfs: introduce in-memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: track the iunlink list pointer in the xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2022-07-11 5:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yry7GeiLpfBu6/1h@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox