public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 1/2] xfs: make sure that we handle empty xattr leaf blocks ok
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:56:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yshhz9NY+EgnMjil@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708163058.vf5bx6tbzr7u7tsy@zlang-mailbox>

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:30:58AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 08:32:01AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Make sure that the kernel can handle empty xattr leaf blocks properly,
> > since we've screwed this up enough times.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v1.1: adopt maintainer's refactoring suggestions, skip v4 filesystems
> > from the start, and check that we really get an attr leaf block.
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/845 |  123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/845
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/845 b/tests/xfs/845
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..0b7f4bff
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/845
> > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 845
> > +#
> > +# Make sure that XFS can handle empty leaf xattr blocks correctly.  These
> > +# blocks can appear in files as a result of system crashes in the middle of
> > +# xattr operations, which means that we /must/ handle them gracefully.
> > +# Check that read and write verifiers won't trip, that the get/list/setxattr
> > +# operations don't stumble over them, and that xfs_repair will offer to remove
> > +# the entire xattr fork if the root xattr leaf block is empty.
> > +#
> > +# Regression test for kernel commit:
> > +#
> > +# af866926d865 ("xfs: empty xattr leaf header blocks are not corruption")
> > +#
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest auto quick attr
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/filter
> > +. ./common/attr
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +_require_scratch
> > +_require_scratch_xfs_crc # V4 is deprecated
> > +_fixed_by_kernel_commit af866926d865 "xfs: empty xattr leaf header blocks are not corruption"
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs >$seqres.full 2>$tmp.mkfs
> > +cat $tmp.mkfs >> $seqres.full
> > +source $tmp.mkfs
> > +_scratch_mount
> > +
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'pwrite -S 0x58 0 64k' $SCRATCH_MNT/largefile >> $seqres.full
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x58 0 $isize" $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +smallfile_md5=$(_md5_checksum $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile)
> > +largefile_md5=$(_md5_checksum $SCRATCH_MNT/largefile)
> > +
> > +# Try to force the creation of a single leaf block in each of three files.
> > +# The first one gets a local attr, the second a remote attr, and the third
> > +# is left for scrub and repair to find.
> > +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/e0
> > +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/e1
> > +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/e2
> > +
> > +$ATTR_PROG -s x $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 < $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile >> $seqres.full
> > +$ATTR_PROG -s x $SCRATCH_MNT/e1 < $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile >> $seqres.full
> > +$ATTR_PROG -s x $SCRATCH_MNT/e2 < $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +e0_ino=$(stat -c '%i' $SCRATCH_MNT/e0)
> > +e1_ino=$(stat -c '%i' $SCRATCH_MNT/e1)
> > +e2_ino=$(stat -c '%i' $SCRATCH_MNT/e2)
> > +
> > +_scratch_unmount
> > +
> > +# We used to think that it wasn't possible for empty xattr leaf blocks to
> > +# exist, but it turns out that setting a large xattr on a file that has no
> > +# xattrs can race with a log flush and crash, which results in an empty
> > +# leaf block being logged and recovered.  This is rather hard to trip, so we
> > +# use xfs_db to turn a regular leaf block into an empty one.
> > +make_empty_leaf() {
> > +	local inum="$1"
> > +
> > +	echo "editing inode $inum" >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +	magic=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field hdr.info.magic "inode $inum" "ablock 0")
> > +	if [ "$magic" != "0x3bee" ]; then
> > +		echo "attr block 0 expected magic 0x3bee, got $magic??"
> > +	fi
> 
> Hmm... sorry I'm a little confused, can we get "hdr.info.magic = 0x3bee"
> from a V5 xfs ablock 0? If it's V5 XFS, I think the magic should be in
> the "info.hdr" field:

<sigh> yes, trying to get things done in too short a time.  This isn't
needed at all anymore.

>   struct xfs_da3_blkinfo {
>       struct xfs_da_blkinfo   hdr;  <== magic in it.
>       ...
>   }
> 
> And is it a duplicate checking with below?

Nope, the second check is fine on its own.

> > +
> > +	magic=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field hdr.info.hdr.magic "inode $inum" "ablock 0")
> > +	if [ "$magic" != "0x3bee" ]; then
> > +		echo "inode $inum ablock 0 is not a leaf block?"
> > +		_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode $inum" -c "ablock 0" -c print >> $seqres.full
> > +		return 1
> 
> How about:
> 
>   if [ "$magic" != "0x3bee" ]; then
>       _scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode $inum" -c "ablock 0" -c print >> $seqres.full
>       _fail "inode $inum ablock 0 is not a leaf block?"
>   fi

Ok.

--D

> 
> > +	fi
> > +
> > +	base=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "hdr.freemap[0].base" "inode $inum" "ablock 0")
> > +
> > +	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode $inum" -c "ablock 0" \
> > +		-c "write -d hdr.count 0" \
> > +		-c "write -d hdr.usedbytes 0" \
> > +		-c "write -d hdr.firstused $dbsize" \
> > +		-c "write -d hdr.freemap[0].size $((dbsize - base))" \
> > +		-c print >> $seqres.full
> > +}
> > +
> > +make_empty_leaf $e0_ino
> > +make_empty_leaf $e1_ino
> > +make_empty_leaf $e2_ino
> > +
> > +_scratch_mount
> > +
> > +# Check that listxattr/getxattr/removexattr do nothing.
> > +$ATTR_PROG -l $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> > +$ATTR_PROG -g x $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> > +$ATTR_PROG -r x $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> > +
> > +# Add a small attr to e0
> > +$ATTR_PROG -s x $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 < $SCRATCH_MNT/smallfile > /dev/null
> > +$ATTR_PROG -l $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 2>&1 | sed -e 's/\([0-9]*\) byte/XXX byte/g' | _filter_scratch
> > +small_md5="$($GETFATTR_PROG -n user.x --absolute-names --only-values $SCRATCH_MNT/e0 | _md5_checksum)"
> > +test "$small_md5" = "$smallfile_md5" || \
> > +	echo "smallfile $smallfile_md5 does not match small attr $small_md5"
> > +
> > +# Add a large attr to e1
> > +$ATTR_PROG -s x $SCRATCH_MNT/e1 < $SCRATCH_MNT/largefile > /dev/null
> > +$ATTR_PROG -l $SCRATCH_MNT/e1 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> > +large_md5="$($GETFATTR_PROG -n user.x --absolute-names --only-values $SCRATCH_MNT/e1 | _md5_checksum)"
> > +test "$large_md5" = "$largefile_md5" || \
> > +	echo "largefile $largefile_md5 does not match large attr $large_md5"
> > +
> > +
> > +# Leave e2 to try to trip the repair tools, since xfs_repair used to flag
> > +# empty leaf blocks incorrectly too.
> > +
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-05 22:02 [PATCHSET 0/2] fstests: new tests for kernel 5.19 Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-05 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: make sure that we handle empty xattr leaf blocks ok Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-07 12:06   ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-07 18:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08  0:49       ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-08 15:08         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08 15:32   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08 16:30     ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-08 16:56       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-07-08 17:02   ` [PATCH " Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08 17:08     ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-08 17:27       ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-08 17:46         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08 18:19           ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-08 17:44   ` [PATCH v1.3 " Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-05 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs/288: skip repair -n when checking empty root leaf block behavior Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-07 12:25   ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-07 18:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-08 15:47       ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yshhz9NY+EgnMjil@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox