Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 0/2] mkfs: stop allowing tiny filesystems
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:04:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yt8FRiODvmtDxrL0@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725075942.erejjxcyjkyhopa3@orion>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:59:42AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:44:58PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The maintainers have been besieged by a /lot/ of complaints recently
> > from people who format tiny filesystems and growfs them into huge ones,
> > and others who format small filesystems.  We don't really want people to
> > have filesystems with no backup superblocks, and there are myriad
> > performance problems on modern-day filesystems when the log gets too
> > small.
> > 
> > Empirical evidence shows that increasing the minimum log size to 64MB
> > eliminates most of the stalling problems and other unwanted behaviors,
> > so this series makes that change and then disables creation of small
> > filesystems, which are defined as single-AGs fses, fses with a log size
> > smaller than 64MB, and fses smaller than 300MB.
> > 
> > v2: rebase to 5.19
> > v3: disable automatic detection of raid stripes when the device is less
> >     than 1G to avoid formatting failures
> > 
> > If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just
> > pull from my git trees, which are linked below.
> > 
> > This is an extraordinary way to destroy everything.  Enjoy!
> > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
> > 
> 
> Both changes looks good to me, but IMHO we really require it to be documented in
> manpages otherwise we'll get (even more) questions about "why can't I create
> small FS'es anymore?".
> But anyway, I can help with the manpages once these patches hit for-next if you
> are ok with it.

Oooh, good point, Eric and I have been too busy figuring out the weird
corner cases and forgot that.  I'll add some manpage updates and send
that out tomorrow.

--D

> 
> -- 
> Carlos Maiolino

      reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <jClQwnsHFSREVSitFnWiO2spgHLt1kaTBHjtDn1V9WeXRB1qq0BOBhwGw25IoTL-aMmeeElWwy2pVsHv9ywuMA==@protonmail.internalid>
2022-07-19 21:44 ` [PATCHSET v3 0/2] mkfs: stop allowing tiny filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-19 21:45   ` [PATCH 1/2] mkfs: ignore data blockdev stripe geometry for small filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-25  7:13     ` Carlos Maiolino
2022-07-19 21:45   ` [PATCH 2/2] mkfs: stop allowing tiny filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-25  7:52     ` Carlos Maiolino
2022-07-25  7:59   ` [PATCHSET v3 0/2] " Carlos Maiolino
2022-07-25 21:04     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yt8FRiODvmtDxrL0@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox