From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/432: fix this test when external devices are in use
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:47:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuHAnCoB4FvMvIzb@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727220600.GU3600936@dread.disaster.area>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 08:06:00AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:51:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > This program exercises metadump and mdrestore being run against the
> > scratch device. Therefore, the test must pass external log / rt device
> > arguments to xfs_repair -n to check the "restored" filesystem. Fix the
> > incorrect usage, and report repair failures, since this test has been
> > silently failing for a while now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tests/xfs/432 | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/432 b/tests/xfs/432
> > index 86012f0b..5c6744ce 100755
> > --- a/tests/xfs/432
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/432
> > @@ -89,7 +89,16 @@ _scratch_xfs_metadump $metadump_file -w
> > xfs_mdrestore $metadump_file $metadump_img
> >
> > echo "Check restored metadump image"
> > -$XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > +repair_args=('-n')
> > +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" ] && \
> > + repair_args+=('-l' "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV")
> > +
> > +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_RTDEV" ] && \
> > + repair_args+=('-r' "$SCRATCH_RTDEV")
> > +
> > +$XFS_REPAIR_PROG "${repair_args[@]}" $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > +res=$?
> > +test $res -ne 0 && echo "xfs_repair on restored fs returned $res?"
>
> I don't like open coding external device support into individual
> tests.
>
> i.e. Shouldn't this use a wrapper around check_xfs_filesystem()
> similar to _check_xfs_test_fs()? Call it check_xfs_scratch_fs() that
> uses SCRATCH_DEV by default, but if $1 is passed in use that as the
> scratch device instead?
Yeah, that would also work. IIRC there's one other fstest that does
something similar to this.
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 19:51 [PATCH] xfs/432: fix this test when external devices are in use Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-27 12:21 ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-27 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-27 17:21 ` Zorro Lang
2022-07-27 23:14 ` [PATCH] xfs/432: fix this test when external devices are in useOM Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-27 22:06 ` [PATCH] xfs/432: fix this test when external devices are in use Dave Chinner
2022-07-27 22:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-07-27 23:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuHAnCoB4FvMvIzb@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox