From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] common: refactor fail_make_request boilerplate
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:01:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuLc8eIfTXTIT/Ca@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165886494011.1585218.15776043472701680079.stgit@magnolia>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:49:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Refactor the control functions from generic/019 into a common helper to
> be used by all three tests that use fail_make_requests.
There is btrfs/271 as well with similar boilerplate as well, which
is why I've been looking into refactoring it before.
> +_start_fail_scratch_dev()
> +{
> + local SYSFS_BDEV=`_sysfs_dev $SCRATCH_DEV`
> + echo "Force SCRATCH_DEV device failure"
> + echo " echo 1 > $SYSFS_BDEV/make-it-fail" >> $seqres.full
> + echo 1 > $SYSFS_BDEV/make-it-fail
> +}
.. and for that use cases we need to pass an explicit device here, and
not just default to $SCRATCH_DEV.
> enable_io_failure()
> {
> + _allow_fail_make_request 100 1000 > /dev/null
> + _start_fail_scratch_dev > /dev/null
> }
>
> disable_io_failure()
> {
> + _stop_fail_scratch_dev > /dev/null
> + _disallow_fail_make_request > /dev/null
> }
Let's just drop these wrappers.
Otherwise this looks really nice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-28 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 19:48 [PATCHSET 0/2] fstests: enhance fail_make_request Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-26 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] common: refactor fail_make_request boilerplate Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-28 19:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-07-26 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] fail_make_request: teach helpers about external devices Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-28 19:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-01 21:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-03 4:22 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] fstests: enhance fail_make_request Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-03 4:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] common: refactor fail_make_request boilerplate Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuLc8eIfTXTIT/Ca@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).