public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Check if a direct write can result in a false ENOSPC error
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:28:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwTkDrlpzPc2TXDC@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220823090433.1164296-1-chandan.babu@oracle.com>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:34:33PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> This commit adds a test to check if a direct write on a delalloc extent
> present in CoW fork can result in a false ENOSPC error. The bug has been fixed
> by upstream commit d62113303d691 ("xfs: Fix false ENOSPC when performing
> direct write on a delalloc extent in cow fork").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/553     | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/553.out |  9 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/553
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/553.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/553 b/tests/xfs/553
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..78ed0995
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/553
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 553
> +#
> +# Test to check if a direct write on a delalloc extent present in CoW fork can
> +# result in an ENOSPC error.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
> +
> +# Import common functions.
> +. ./common/reflink
> +. ./common/inject
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit d62113303d691 \
> +	"xfs: Fix false ENOSPC when performing direct write on a delalloc extent in cow fork"
> +_require_scratch_reflink
> +_require_xfs_debug
> +_require_test_program "punch-alternating"
> +_require_xfs_io_error_injection "bmap_alloc_minlen_extent"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "reflink"
> +_require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> +
> +source=${SCRATCH_MNT}/source
> +destination=${SCRATCH_MNT}/destination
> +fragmented_file=${SCRATCH_MNT}/fragmented_file
> +
> +echo "Format and mount fs"
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Create source file"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 32M" $source >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Reflink destination file with source file"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "reflink $source" $destination >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Set destination file's cowextsize"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 16M" $destination >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Fragment FS"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 64M" $fragmented_file >> $seqres.full
> +sync
> +$here/src/punch-alternating $fragmented_file >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Inject bmap_alloc_minlen_extent error tag"
> +_scratch_inject_error bmap_alloc_minlen_extent 1
> +
> +echo "Create 16MiB delalloc extent in destination file's CoW fork"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 4k" $destination >> $seqres.full
> +
> +sync
> +
> +echo "Direct I/O write at 12k file offset in destination file"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite 12k 8k" $destination >> $seqres.full

Does this still work if the blocksize is 64k? ;)

(The rest of the test code looks ok to me)

--D

> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/553.out b/tests/xfs/553.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..a2e91678
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/553.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +QA output created by 553
> +Format and mount fs
> +Create source file
> +Reflink destination file with source file
> +Set destination file's cowextsize
> +Fragment FS
> +Inject bmap_alloc_minlen_extent error tag
> +Create 16MiB delalloc extent in destination file's CoW fork
> +Direct I/O write at 12k file offset in destination file
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-23  9:04 [PATCH] xfs: Check if a direct write can result in a false ENOSPC error Chandan Babu R
2022-08-23 14:28 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-08-24  9:22   ` Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwTkDrlpzPc2TXDC@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox