From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linfeilong <linfeilong@huawei.com>,
wuguanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: donot need to check return value of xlog_kvmalloc()
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:08:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxDZAP8zfQFqWFWY@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471db2ec-8836-14f5-fb33-579b294943e9@huawei.com>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:59:08AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
> In xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(), xlog_kvmalloc() is called
> to alloc memory, which will always return
> successfully, so we donot need to check return value.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Makes sense...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> Changelog:
> V1 -> V2:
> 1.add Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> 2.remove santity check of xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc()
> suggested by Eric Sandeen.
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> index 5077a7ad5646..cf5ce607dc05 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> @@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(
> */
> nv = xlog_kvmalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_nameval) +
> name_len + value_len);
> - if (!nv)
> - return nv;
>
> nv->name.i_addr = nv + 1;
> nv->name.i_len = name_len;
> @@ -441,8 +439,6 @@ xfs_attr_create_intent(
> attr->xattri_nameval = xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(args->name,
> args->namelen, args->value, args->valuelen);
> }
> - if (!attr->xattri_nameval)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> attrip = xfs_attri_init(mp, attr->xattri_nameval);
> xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &attrip->attri_item);
> @@ -762,8 +758,6 @@ xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2(
> nv = xfs_attri_log_nameval_alloc(attr_name,
> attri_formatp->alfi_name_len, attr_value,
> attri_formatp->alfi_value_len);
> - if (!nv)
> - return -ENOMEM;
>
> attrip = xfs_attri_init(mp, nv);
> error = xfs_attri_copy_format(&item->ri_buf[0], &attrip->attri_format);
> --
> 2.33.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 2:59 [PATCH v2] xfs: donot need to check return value of xlog_kvmalloc() Zhiqiang Liu
2022-09-01 16:08 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxDZAP8zfQFqWFWY@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
--cc=wuguanghao3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).