linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:23:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4kWf4oCHNd86Hkd@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4grgXw2iw0lgKqD@dread.disaster.area>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:41:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:40:51AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
...
> 
> > I don't really have time to turn this hand waving into, but maybe we 
> > should think if it's worthwhile or if I'm missing something important.
> 
> If people are OK with XFS moving to exclusive buffered or DIO
> submission model, then I can find some time to work on the
> converting the IO path locking to use a two-state shared lock in
> preparation for the batched folio stuff that will allow concurrent
> buffered writes...
> 

Ack to this, FWIW. I think this is a natural/logical approach,
prototyping and whatnot notwithstanding.

Brian

> -Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-26  6:16 [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read Chi Zhiling
2024-12-26 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-28  7:37   ` Chi Zhiling
2024-12-28 22:17     ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-30  2:42       ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-07 12:13         ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-07 17:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08  7:43           ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-08 11:33             ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-08 11:45               ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-08 12:15               ` John Garry
2025-01-09 10:07                 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-09 12:40                   ` John Garry
2025-01-09  8:37               ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-09 10:25                 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-09 12:10                   ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-09 12:25                     ` John Garry
2025-01-08 17:35             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-09 23:28               ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-10  1:31                 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-10 17:07                 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-12 10:05                   ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-13  2:44                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-13  5:59                       ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-13 13:40                       ` Brian Foster
2025-01-13 16:19                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-15  5:55                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-15 21:41                           ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-16  4:36                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 22:20                               ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-16 14:23                             ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-01-17 13:27                             ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-17 22:19                               ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-18 13:03                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-20  5:11                                   ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-22  6:08                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 23:35                                   ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-17 16:12                             ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-24  7:57                             ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-27 20:49                               ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-28  5:15                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 21:23                                   ` David Laight
2025-01-29  0:59                                   ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-29  5:20                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-10  1:44                                 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-14  0:09                   ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-25  8:43           ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-01-25 14:14             ` Amir Goldstein
2025-06-20 14:03   ` Jinliang Zheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-25  0:10 [QUESTION] Long read latencies on mixed rw buffered IO Dave Chinner
2025-06-20 13:46 ` [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read Jinliang Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z4kWf4oCHNd86Hkd@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=chizhiling@163.com \
    --cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).