From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
gost.dev@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: use stx_blksize for dev block size by default
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:10:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z61wnFLUGz6d_WSh@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <323gt6bngrysa3i6nzgih6golhs3wovawnn5chjcrkegajinw7@fxdjlji5xbxb>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > > performance in the stx_blksize field of the statx data structure. This
> > > change updates the current default 4 KiB block size for all devices
> > > reporting a minimum I/O larger than 4 KiB, opting instead to query for
> > > its advertised minimum I/O value in the statx data struct.
> >
> > UUuh, no. Larger block sizes have their use cases, but this will
> > regress performance for a lot (most?) common setups. A lot of
> > device report fairly high values there, but say increasing the
>
> Are these devices reporting the correct value?
Who defines what "correct" means to start with?
> As I mentioned in my
> discussion with Darrick, matching the minimum_io_size with the "fs
> fundamental blocksize" actually allows to avoid RMW operations (when
> using the default path in mkfs.xfs and the value reported is within
> boundaries).
At least for buffered I/O it does not remove RMW operations at all,
it just moves them up.
And for plenty devices the min_io size might be set to larger than
LBA size, but the device is still reasonably efficient at handling
smaller I/O (e.g. because it has power loss protection and stages
writes in powerfail protected memory).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 19:00 [PATCH] mkfs: use stx_blksize for dev block size by default da.gomez
2025-02-06 22:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 22:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-06 23:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 9:12 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-02-07 19:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-07 9:39 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-02-07 19:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-07 19:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 19:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-07 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-07 10:04 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-02-13 4:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-02-13 13:26 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-02-18 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-09 14:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-05-13 5:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z61wnFLUGz6d_WSh@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox