From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>,
Aravinda Herle <araherle@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 3/3] iomap: Support subpage size dirty tracking to improve write performance
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 04:59:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFR/GuVca5nFlLYF@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zg6j1mpy.fsf@doe.com>
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 08:57:53AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:
> > "per-filesystem"? I think you mean "per-block (uptodate|block) state".
(s/|block/|dirty/, sorry)
> > Using "per-block" naming throughout this patchset might help readability.
> > It's currently an awkward mix of "subpage", "sub-page" and "sub-folio".
> and subfolio to add.
>
> Yes, I agree it got all mixed up in the comments.
> Let me stick to sub-folio (which was what we were using earlier [1])
I think per-block is better? sub-folio might be at almost any
granularity, but per-block is specific.
> >> +static void iomap_iop_set_range(struct folio *folio, struct iomap_page *iop,
> >> + size_t off, size_t len, enum iop_state state)
> >
> > I can't believe this is what Dave wanted you to do. iomap_iop_set_range()
> > should be the low-level helper called by iop_set_range_uptodate() and
> > iop_set_range_dirty(), not the other way around.
>
> Ok, I see the confusion, I think if we make
> iomap_iop_set_range() to iomap_set_range(), then that should be good.
> Then it becomes iomap_set_range() calling
> iop_set_range_update() & iop_set_range_dirty() as the lower level helper routines.
>
> Based on the the existing code, I believe this ^^^^ is how the heirarchy
> should look like. Does it look good then? If yes, I will simply drop the
> "_iop" part in the next rev.
I don't think that's what I'm saying. The next version
should not have enum iop_state in it.
ie it looks something like:
iomap_set_range()
{
bitmap_set(...);
}
iomap_set_range_uptodate()
{
iomap_set_range(...);
}
iomap_set_range_dirty()
{
iomap_set_range(...);
}
> <Relevant function list>
> iop_set_range_uptodate
> iop_clear_range_uptodate
> iop_test_uptodate
> iop_uptodate_full
> iop_set_range_dirty
> iop_clear_range_dirty
> iop_test_dirty
> iomap_page_create
> iomap_page_release
> iomap_iop_set_range -> iomap_set_range()
> iomap_iop_clear_range -> iomap_clear_range()
>
> -ritesh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-05 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-04 14:51 [RFCv4 0/3] iomap: Support subpage size dirty tracking to improve write performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-04 14:51 ` [RFCv4 1/3] iomap: Allocate iop in ->write_begin() early Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-04 14:51 ` [RFCv4 2/3] iomap: Change uptodate variable name to state Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-04 14:51 ` [RFCv4 3/3] iomap: Support subpage size dirty tracking to improve write performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-04 15:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-05 3:27 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-05 3:59 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFR/GuVca5nFlLYF@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=araherle@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).