Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next rebased to d4d12c02bf5f

[Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:09:51PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:07:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > I just rebased the for-next tree to correct a bad fixes tag in
> > the tree that was flags by a linux-next sanity check. The code is
> > the same, just a commit message needed rewriting, but that means all
> > the commit change and you'll need to do forced update if you pulled
> > the branch I pushed a few hours ago.
> > 
> > -Dave.
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next
> > 
> >   Head Commit: d4d12c02bf5f768f1b423c7ae2909c5afdfe0d5f
> > 
> >   xfs: collect errors from inodegc for unlinked inode recovery (2023-06-05 14:48:15 +1000)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Darrick J. Wong (1):
> >       xfs: fix broken logic when detecting mergeable bmap records
> > 
> > Dave Chinner (9):
> >       xfs: buffer pins need to hold a buffer reference
> >       xfs: restore allocation trylock iteration
> >       xfs: defered work could create precommits
> >       xfs: fix AGF vs inode cluster buffer deadlock
> >       xfs: fix double xfs_perag_rele() in xfs_filestream_pick_ag()
> >       xfs: fix agf/agfl verification on v4 filesystems
> >       xfs: validity check agbnos on the AGFL
> >       xfs: validate block number being freed before adding to xefi
> >       xfs: collect errors from inodegc for unlinked inode recovery
> > 
> > Geert Uytterhoeven (1):
> >       xfs: Fix undefined behavior of shift into sign bit
> 
> Hmm, I don't see "xfs: fix ag count overflow during growfs" in here.

No, I didn't pick it up because it conflicted with other bug fix
stuff I am currently working on and I needed to look at it in more
detail before doing anything with it. I hadn't followed the
development of the patch at all, and it was up to v4 so I was going
to need to spend a little bit of time on it to see what the history
of it was first....

> Dave, do you want to do another 6.4 bug release, or throw things back
> over the wall so I can merge all the rest of the pending fixes for 6.5?

If you want, you can pick it up once I've sent a pull request for
the current set of fixes in for-next. That will be later this week;
it needs to spend a couple of days in linux-next before that
happens, though.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com