From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tkhai@ya.ru, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
vbabka@suse.cz, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
djwong@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: split unregister_shrinker()
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 08:57:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHfQ3gzFToAfee/d@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531095742.2480623-3-qi.zheng@linux.dev>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:57:36AM +0000, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
>
> This and the next patches in this series aim to make
> time effect of synchronize_srcu() invisible for user.
> The patch splits unregister_shrinker() in two functions:
>
> unregister_shrinker_delayed_initiate()
> unregister_shrinker_delayed_finalize()
>
> and shrinker users may make the second of them to be called
> asynchronous (e.g., from workqueue). Next patches make
> superblock shrinker to follow this way, so user-visible
> umount() time won't contain delays from synchronize_srcu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 2 ++
> mm/vmscan.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index 224293b2dd06..e9d5a19d83fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ extern void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> extern int __printf(2, 3) register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> const char *fmt, ...);
> extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> +extern void unregister_shrinker_delayed_initiate(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> +extern void unregister_shrinker_delayed_finalize(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> extern void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> extern void synchronize_shrinkers(void);
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a773e97e152e..baf8d2327d70 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -799,10 +799,7 @@ int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
> #endif
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_shrinker);
>
> -/*
> - * Remove one
> - */
> -void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +void unregister_shrinker_delayed_initiate(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> {
> struct dentry *debugfs_entry;
> int debugfs_id;
> @@ -819,6 +816,13 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
>
> shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_shrinker_delayed_initiate);
> +
> +void unregister_shrinker_delayed_finalize(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +{
> + if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
> + return;
This is new logic and isn't explained anywhere: why do we want to
avoid RCU cleanup if (shrinker->nr_deferred == 0)? Regardless,
whatever this is avoiding, it needs a comment to explain it.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 9:57 [PATCH 0/8] make unregistration of super_block shrinker more faster Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: move shrinker_debugfs_remove() before synchronize_srcu() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 10:49 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-31 12:52 ` Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: split unregister_shrinker() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 22:57 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: move list_lru_destroy() to destroy_super_work() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] fs: shrink only (SB_ACTIVE|SB_BORN) superblocks in super_cache_scan() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 23:12 ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: introduce struct super_operations::destroy_super() callback Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 11:19 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-31 12:54 ` Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: introduce xfs_fs_destroy_super() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-01 8:43 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-01 9:58 ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-01 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-02 3:13 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-02 15:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-05 11:50 ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-05 12:16 ` Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] shmem: implement shmem_destroy_super() Qi Zheng
2023-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: use unregister_shrinker_delayed_{initiate, finalize} for super_block shrinker Qi Zheng
[not found] ` <20230531114054.bf077db642aa9c58c0831687@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-01 8:46 ` [PATCH 0/8] make unregistration of super_block shrinker more faster Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHfQ3gzFToAfee/d@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox