From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiang.yong5@zte.com.cn,
wang.liang82@zte.com.cn, liu.dong3@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: introduce protection for drop nlink
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:08:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOlsvPa2imANAzRu@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825175627.GK17912@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:56:27AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 05:09:20PM +0800, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:43:52PM +0800, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > >> From: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
> > >> An dir nlinks overflow which down form 0 to 0xffffffff, cause the
> > >> directory to become unusable until the next xfs_repair run.
> > > Hmmm. How does this ever happen?
> > > IMO, if it does happen, we need to fix whatever bug that causes it
> > > to happen, not issue a warning and do nothing about the fact we
> > > just hit a corrupt inode state...
> > Yes, I'm very agree with your opinion. But I don't know how it happened,
> > and how to reproduce it.
>
> Wait, is this the result of a customer problem? Or static analysis?
>
> > >> Introduce protection for drop nlink to reduce the impact of this.
> > >> And produce a warning for directory nlink error during remove.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
> > >> ---
> > >> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > >> index 9e62cc5..536dbe4 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > >> @@ -919,6 +919,15 @@ STATIC int xfs_iunlink_remove(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_perag *pag,
>
> I'm not sure why your diff program thinks this hunk is from
> xfs_iunlink_remove, seeing as the line numbers of the chunk point to
> xfs_droplink. Maybe that's what's going on in this part of the thread?
Yes.
I don't expect patches to be mangled like this - I generally
take the hunk prefix to indicate what code is being modified when
reading patches, not expecting that the hunk is modifying code over
a thousand lines prior to the function in the prefix...
So, yeah, something went very wrong with the generation of this
patch...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-26 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 7:43 [PATCH] xfs: introduce protection for drop nlink cheng.lin130
2023-08-24 16:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-25 8:32 ` cheng.lin130
2023-08-25 18:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-26 14:54 ` cheng.lin130
2023-08-26 21:28 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-28 3:29 ` cheng.lin130
2023-08-28 5:21 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <202309041042177773780@zte.com.cn>
2023-09-04 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-24 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-25 9:09 ` cheng.lin130
2023-08-25 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-26 3:08 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-08-26 15:08 ` cheng.lin130
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOlsvPa2imANAzRu@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jiang.yong5@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.dong3@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wang.liang82@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).