From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: only call xchk_stats_merge after validating scrub inputs
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:46:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP/tOMEfDaSe3ndX@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230911153732.GZ28186@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:37:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Harshit Mogalapalli slogged through several reports from our internal
> syzbot instance and observed that they all had a common stack trace:
>
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:96 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1294 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:111 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in do_raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:187 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:134 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in _raw_spin_lock+0x76/0xe0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
> Write of size 4 at addr 0000001dd87ee280 by task syz-executor365/1543
>
> CPU: 2 PID: 1543 Comm: syz-executor365 Not tainted 6.5.0-syzk #1
> Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7860+a7792d29 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x83/0xb0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> print_report+0x3f8/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:478
> kasan_report+0xb0/0xe0 mm/kasan/report.c:588
> check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:181 [inline]
> kasan_check_range+0x139/0x1e0 mm/kasan/generic.c:187
> instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:96 [inline]
> atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1294 [inline]
> queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:111 [inline]
> do_raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:187 [inline]
> __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:134 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock+0x76/0xe0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
> spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
> xchk_stats_merge_one.isra.1+0x39/0x650 fs/xfs/scrub/stats.c:191
> xchk_stats_merge+0x5f/0xe0 fs/xfs/scrub/stats.c:225
> xfs_scrub_metadata+0x252/0x14e0 fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c:599
> xfs_ioc_scrub_metadata+0xc8/0x160 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c:1646
> xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0x1870 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c:1955
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x199/0x220 fs/ioctl.c:857
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> RIP: 0033:0x7ff155af753d
> Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 1b 79 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffc006e2568 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007ff155af753d
> RDX: 00000000200000c0 RSI: 00000000c040583c RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00000000ffffffff R08: 00000000004010c0 R09: 00000000004010c0
> R10: 00000000004010c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400cb0
> R13: 00007ffc006e2670 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> </TASK>
>
> The root cause here is that xchk_stats_merge_one walks off the end of
> the xchk_scrub_stats.cs_stats array because it has been fed a garbage
> value in sm->sm_type. That occurs because I put the xchk_stats_merge
> in the wrong place -- it should have been after the last xchk_teardown
> call on our way out of xfs_scrub_metadata because we only call the
> teardown function if we called the setup function, and we don't call the
> setup functions if the inputs are obviously garbage.
>
> Thanks to Harshit for triaging the bug reports and bringing this to my
> attention. This is a helluva better way to handle syzbot reports than
> spraying sploits on the public list like Googlers do.
That last sentence doesn't need to be in the commit message.
Other than that, the fix looks good.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 15:37 [PATCH] xfs: only call xchk_stats_merge after validating scrub inputs Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-12 4:46 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZP/tOMEfDaSe3ndX@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox