From: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
To: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
shrikanth hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: load uncached unlinked inodes into memory on demand
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:18:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPD1qsrKB8P64iRM@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPDXqUJ94w8ZgOqy@redhat.com>
I jumped the gun and only reviewed the userspace patches. Sorry,
I'll actually look at the kernel patch now. ;)
-Bill
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:10:49PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:26:59AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > shrikanth hegde reports that filesystems fail shortly after mount with
> > the following failure:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 56 PID: 12450 at fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:1839 xfs_iunlink_lookup+0x58/0x80 [xfs]
> >
> > This of course is the WARN_ON_ONCE in xfs_iunlink_lookup:
> >
> > ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino);
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ip || !ip->i_ino)) { ... }
> >
> > From diagnostic data collected by the bug reporters, it would appear
> > that we cleanly mounted a filesystem that contained unlinked inodes.
> > Unlinked inodes are only processed as a final step of log recovery,
> > which means that clean mounts do not process the unlinked list at all.
> >
> > Prior to the introduction of the incore unlinked lists, this wasn't a
> > problem because the unlink code would (very expensively) traverse the
> > entire ondisk metadata iunlink chain to keep things up to date.
> > However, the incore unlinked list code complains when it realizes that
> > it is out of sync with the ondisk metadata and shuts down the fs, which
> > is bad.
> >
> > Ritesh proposed to solve this problem by unconditionally parsing the
> > unlinked lists at mount time, but this imposes a mount time cost for
> > every filesystem to catch something that should be very infrequent.
> > Instead, let's target the places where we can encounter a next_unlinked
> > pointer that refers to an inode that is not in cache, and load it into
> > cache.
> >
> > Note: This patch does not address the problem of iget loading an inode
> > from the middle of the iunlink list and needing to set i_prev_unlinked
> > correctly.
> >
> > Reported-by: shrikanth hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Triaged-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> This LGTM. Thanks!
> Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
>
> > ---
> > v2: log that we're doing runtime recovery, dont mess with DONTCACHE,
> > and actually return ENOLINK
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index 6ee266be45d4..2942002560b5 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@ -1829,12 +1829,17 @@ xfs_iunlink_lookup(
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino);
> > + if (!ip) {
> > + /* Caller can handle inode not being in memory. */
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Inode not in memory or in RCU freeing limbo should not happen.
> > - * Warn about this and let the caller handle the failure.
> > + * Inode in RCU freeing limbo should not happen. Warn about this and
> > + * let the caller handle the failure.
> > */
> > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ip || !ip->i_ino)) {
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ip->i_ino)) {
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -1858,7 +1863,8 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_backref(
> >
> > ip = xfs_iunlink_lookup(pag, next_agino);
> > if (!ip)
> > - return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > + return -ENOLINK;
> > +
> > ip->i_prev_unlinked = prev_agino;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1902,6 +1908,62 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_bucket(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Load the inode @next_agino into the cache and set its prev_unlinked pointer
> > + * to @prev_agino. Caller must hold the AGI to synchronize with other changes
> > + * to the unlinked list.
> > + */
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_iunlink_reload_next(
> > + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > + struct xfs_buf *agibp,
> > + xfs_agino_t prev_agino,
> > + xfs_agino_t next_agino)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_perag *pag = agibp->b_pag;
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount;
> > + struct xfs_inode *next_ip = NULL;
> > + xfs_ino_t ino;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + ASSERT(next_agino != NULLAGINO);
> > +
> > +#ifdef DEBUG
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + next_ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, next_agino);
> > + ASSERT(next_ip == NULL);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + xfs_info_ratelimited(mp,
> > + "Found unrecovered unlinked inode 0x%x in AG 0x%x. Initiating recovery.",
> > + next_agino, pag->pag_agno);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Use an untrusted lookup to be cautious in case the AGI has been
> > + * corrupted and now points at a free inode. That shouldn't happen,
> > + * but we'd rather shut down now since we're already running in a weird
> > + * situation.
> > + */
> > + ino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, pag->pag_agno, next_agino);
> > + error = xfs_iget(mp, tp, ino, XFS_IGET_UNTRUSTED, 0, &next_ip);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + /* If this is not an unlinked inode, something is very wrong. */
> > + if (VFS_I(next_ip)->i_nlink != 0) {
> > + error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > + goto rele;
> > + }
> > +
> > + next_ip->i_prev_unlinked = prev_agino;
> > + trace_xfs_iunlink_reload_next(next_ip);
> > +rele:
> > + ASSERT(!(VFS_I(next_ip)->i_state & I_DONTCACHE));
> > + xfs_irele(next_ip);
> > + return error;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > xfs_iunlink_insert_inode(
> > struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > @@ -1933,6 +1995,8 @@ xfs_iunlink_insert_inode(
> > * inode.
> > */
> > error = xfs_iunlink_update_backref(pag, agino, next_agino);
> > + if (error == -ENOLINK)
> > + error = xfs_iunlink_reload_next(tp, agibp, agino, next_agino);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > @@ -2027,6 +2091,9 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
> > */
> > error = xfs_iunlink_update_backref(pag, ip->i_prev_unlinked,
> > ip->i_next_unlinked);
> > + if (error == -ENOLINK)
> > + error = xfs_iunlink_reload_next(tp, agibp, ip->i_prev_unlinked,
> > + ip->i_next_unlinked);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > index 36bd42ed9ec8..f4e46bac9b91 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > @@ -3832,6 +3832,31 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xfs_iunlink_update_dinode,
> > __entry->new_ptr)
> > );
> >
> > +TRACE_EVENT(xfs_iunlink_reload_next,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_inode *ip),
> > + TP_ARGS(ip),
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(dev_t, dev)
> > + __field(xfs_agnumber_t, agno)
> > + __field(xfs_agino_t, agino)
> > + __field(xfs_agino_t, prev_agino)
> > + __field(xfs_agino_t, next_agino)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->dev = ip->i_mount->m_super->s_dev;
> > + __entry->agno = XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
> > + __entry->agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
> > + __entry->prev_agino = ip->i_prev_unlinked;
> > + __entry->next_agino = ip->i_next_unlinked;
> > + ),
> > + TP_printk("dev %d:%d agno 0x%x agino 0x%x prev_unlinked 0x%x next_unlinked 0x%x",
> > + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> > + __entry->agno,
> > + __entry->agino,
> > + __entry->prev_agino,
> > + __entry->next_agino)
> > +);
> > +
> > DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_ag_inode_class,
> > TP_PROTO(struct xfs_inode *ip),
> > TP_ARGS(ip),
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-31 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 15:26 [PATCH v2] xfs: load uncached unlinked inodes into memory on demand Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-30 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-30 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: dump unlinked buckets Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-31 20:01 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-30 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs_db: create unlinked inodes Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-31 20:02 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-30 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH] fstests: test unlinked inode list repair on demand Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-31 12:39 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: load uncached unlinked inodes into memory " Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-31 20:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2023-08-31 22:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-31 17:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2023-08-31 18:10 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-31 20:18 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2023-09-01 14:31 ` Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPD1qsrKB8P64iRM@redhat.com \
--to=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox