From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: use agno/agbno in xfs_alloc_vextent functions
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:02:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR6l1KwGAt/hjLJl@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004001943.349265-7-david@fromorbit.com>
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 0:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] xfs: push perags further into allocation routines Dave Chinner
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: split xfs_bmap_btalloc_at_eof() Dave Chinner
2023-10-04 23:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-05 9:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: contiguous EOF allocation across AGs Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-06 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: select the AG with the largest contiguous space Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-05 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-24 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: push the perag outwards in initial allocation Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 11:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: aligned EOF allocations don't need to scan AGs anymore Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 11:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-06 5:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: use agno/agbno in xfs_alloc_vextent functions Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-10-06 5:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: caller perag always supplied to xfs_alloc_vextent_near_bno Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-06 5:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: collapse near and exact bno allocation Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-06 6:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-04 0:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: return -ENOSPC rather than NULLFSBLOCK from allocation functions Dave Chinner
2023-10-05 12:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR6l1KwGAt/hjLJl@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).