From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="1Sp2UA+E" Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFDEE6 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 20:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ji6mKHd9e9uYYFqbJTNaa87Kwz6226TfoJyZZr6OMAM=; b=1Sp2UA+E5r29hDN3kkqzqONlW4 dqGAyevdfOZ1u7uWngvBlJlCznehmGFEoaLmYWn2Em+js5ZE8q6cPBRqEp9MuNoTsvV4TXePpgaEI zVaBgiHOq4TGz1OFsdnVEsBfbAB/irGYEsX25By/lrcAZXRpUWC1PK9xCXq38TyQfUqbXncbeSPFd nPUSNxQ7w50QEpDPy3QHTPHxNbZsQKuj2bmFTKnUqtFhf2rM9t8hweh6baQ1nqVlGdYiSfYwVxNyW DEzEG3SSNMbJYVVwFkDDkb5SrvuG9eX5GwNOI08UWorgAgE7D6aCa8kDS5I8Lb5fAu0B+ld26H1+3 U6jZUYug==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rA0tH-0030NL-15; Mon, 04 Dec 2023 04:49:07 +0000 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 20:49:07 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: repair quotas Message-ID: References: <170086928781.2771741.1842650188784688715.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170086928871.2771741.2277452744114090363.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20231130221015.GR361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231130221015.GR361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:10:15PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > sorta slow, so perhaps it would be justified to create a special > no-alloc dqget function where the caller is allowed to pre-acquire the > ILOCK. That beeing said, a no-alloc dqget does sound like a sensible idea in general.