From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="1xe8RgWP" Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B95DE for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 21:43:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=9/xoNN/u7WzPNODuw/bokKsZImcV3WzqoVZF7GlasXM=; b=1xe8RgWP0hMT8iER63JffA5ofK sM07a2kj+U8iXDbbtFOdbT4F6gTXV1qWXL1D76/j4A1PoBpyOvneKFnEBQE+Vf8ewVZ/FOyOcddfV tk8CWK0PjCQce0XU92T1lMilEONzvX5gIUa599tfelZ/3KGMduLaHNf7sB5TN/Bn141ukLJMiOEVl J11jiDwfGRtj62Re/I4Q3CGGI/l00n4/ZNajADdMfO2vxyXEE2+l2tNzAgLAOcYm9Myn54DOkO0Zn Dj8L/iCjEGS3TUa8bzHWzCY2U7G+CdXU43rrz3y9msM/Aki1hCcwoJd7bN3j2rHGfce6T1O7AaBUZ yniwGOjw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r7qt5-004Aes-0T; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 05:43:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 21:43:59 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: create separate structures and code for u32 bitmaps Message-ID: References: <170086926983.2770967.13303859275299344660.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170086927011.2770967.5667556103424812308.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20231128013444.GM2766956@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231128013444.GM2766956@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Also why are the agb_bitmap* wrappers in bitmap.h? Following our > > usual code organization I'd expect bitmap.[ch] to just be the > > library code and have users outside of that. Maybe for later.. > > Those wrappers are trivial except for the enhanced typechecking, so I > didn't think it was a big deal to cram them into bitmap.h. I find that kind of code structure a bit confusion to be honest. If you prefer it I can live with it (at least fow now :)) of course.