From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xfstests generic/648] 64k directory block size (-n size=65536) crash on _xfs_buf_ioapply
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:21:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za5PoyT0WZdqgphT@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122072312.usotep2ajokhcuci@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:23:12PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:58:49AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 07:26:00PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 06:17:24PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > Perhaps a bisect from 6.7 to 6.7+linux-xfs/for-next to identify what
> > > > fixed it? Nothing in the for-next branch really looks relevant to
> > > > the problem to me....
> > >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > Finally, I got a chance to reproduce this issue on latest upstream mainline
> > > linux (HEAD=9d64bf433c53) (and linux-xfs) again.
> > >
> > > Looks like some userspace updates hide the issue, but I haven't found out what
> > > change does that, due to it's a big change about a whole system version. I
> > > reproduced this issue again by using an old RHEL distro (but the kernel is the newest).
> > > (I'll try to find out what changes cause that later if it's necessary)
> > >
> > > Anyway, I enabled the "CONFIG_XFS_ASSERT_FATAL=y" and "CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y" as
> > > you suggested. And got the xfs metadump file after it crashed [1] and rebooted.
> > >
> > > Due to g/648 tests on a loopimg in SCRATCH_MNT, so I didn't dump the SCRATCH_DEV,
> > > but dumped the $SCRATCH_MNT/testfs file, you can get the metadump file from:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/14q7iRl7vFyrEKvv_Wqqwlue6vHGdIFO1/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > Ok, I forgot the log on s390 is in big endian format. I don't have a
> > bigendian machine here, so I can't replay the log to trace it or
> > find out what disk address the buffer belongs. I can't even use
> > xfs_logprint to dump the log.
> >
> > Can you take that metadump, restore it on the s390 machine, and
> > trace a mount attempt? i.e in one shell run 'trace-cmd record -e
> > xfs\*' and then in another shell run 'mount testfs.img /mnt/test'
>
> The 'mount testfs.img /mnt/test' will crash the kernel and reboot
> the system directly ...
Turn off panic-on-oops. Some thing like 'echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops' will do that, I think.
> > and then after the assert fail terminate the tracing and run
> > 'trace-cmd report > testfs.trace.txt'?
>
> ... Can I still get the trace report after rebooting?
Not that I know of. But, then again, I don't reboot test machines
when an oops or assert fail occurs - I like to have a warm corpse
left behind that I can poke around in with various blunt instruments
to see what went wrong....
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 14:01 [xfstests generic/648] 64k directory block size (-n size=65536) crash on _xfs_buf_ioapply Zorro Lang
2023-12-18 17:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 6:34 ` Zorro Lang
2023-12-25 13:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-04 4:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-18 1:59 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-18 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-19 1:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-19 7:17 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-20 11:26 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-20 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-22 7:23 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-22 11:21 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-01-22 13:18 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-22 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-22 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-23 7:02 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-23 20:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Za5PoyT0WZdqgphT@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox