From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0B551C54 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T5qjb8Bo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704992367; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wx+dOtvAsy73MShjXLqNM5VTysHMNDO8WgMjL3CrPKg=; b=T5qjb8Bol5N2RhSzxaKWCekSUABl8RU7l5L/Qoj3UoK5dSIWDDUT11p5sjs6o3D2s2/gVj tcSm1X7fcwTdPd4zjWGNlSYXWBSpoC8WXsI/xxMwJVqh/d92ncEIa5Xrjs5C8e6tqpVUUP wTjHvxDHYILhYz42GoCuSXrSa4AmZ3k= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-204-cgLKHKK8MuueJDOmIUcLFg-1; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:59:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cgLKHKK8MuueJDOmIUcLFg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65169108BF30; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.17.159]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCE640C6EB9; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:59:21 -0600 From: Bill O'Donnell To: Shiyang Ruan Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org, chandan.babu@oracle.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX Message-ID: References: <20230915063854.1784918-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230915063854.1784918-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:38:54PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote: > FSDAX and reflink can work together now, let's drop this warning. > > Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan Are there any updates on this? Thanks- Bill > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c > index 1f77014c6e1a..faee773fa026 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c > @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ xfs_setup_dax_always( > return -EINVAL; > } > > - xfs_warn(mp, "DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk"); > return 0; > > disable_dax: > -- > 2.42.0 >