From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, chandan.babu@oracle.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] fs: iomap: Sub-extent zeroing
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 08:14:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZejcyPPX3bVdvJyV@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304130428.13026-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:04:21PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> For FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN support, we want to treat any sub-extent IO like
> sub-fsblock DIO, in that we will zero the sub-extent when the mapping is
> unwritten.
>
> This will be important for atomic writes support, in that atomically
> writing over a partially written extent would mean that we would need to
> do the unwritten extent conversion write separately, and the write could
> no longer be atomic.
>
> It is the task of the FS to set iomap.extent_shift per iter to indicate
> sub-extent zeroing required.
>
> Maybe a macro like i_blocksize() should be introduced for extent sizes,
> instead of using extent_shift. It would also eliminate excessive use
> of xfs_get_extss() for XFS in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 14 ++++++++------
> include/linux/iomap.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index bcd3f8cf5ea4..733f83f839b6 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> {
> const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
> struct inode *inode = iter->inode;
> - unsigned int fs_block_size = i_blocksize(inode), pad;
> + unsigned int zeroing_size, pad;
> loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
> loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> blk_opf_t bio_opf;
> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> size_t copied = 0;
> size_t orig_count;
>
> + zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode) << iomap->extent_shift;
The iomap interfaces use units of bytes for offsets, sizes, ranges,
etc. Using shifts to define a granularity value seems like a
throwback to decades old XFS code and just a bit weird nowdays. Can
we just pass this as a byte count? i.e.:
zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode);
if (iomap->extent_size)
zeroing_size = iomap->extent_size;
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 13:04 [PATCH v2 00/14] block atomic writes for XFS John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] block: Add blk_validate_atomic_write_op_size() John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] fs: xfs: Don't use low-space allocator for alignment > 1 John Garry
2024-03-04 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-05 13:36 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] fs: xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] fs: xfs: Make file data allocations observe the 'forcealign' flag John Garry
2024-03-05 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-05 15:22 ` John Garry
2024-03-05 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-06 5:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfs: forced extent alignment Dave Chinner
2024-03-06 5:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: simplify extent allocation alignment Dave Chinner
2024-03-13 11:03 ` John Garry
2024-03-20 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-26 16:08 ` John Garry
2024-04-02 5:58 ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-02 7:49 ` John Garry
2024-04-02 15:11 ` John Garry
2024-04-02 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-03 8:49 ` John Garry
2024-04-02 23:44 ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-03 11:30 ` John Garry
2024-03-06 5:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler Dave Chinner
2024-03-06 5:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: introduce forced allocation alignment Dave Chinner
2024-03-06 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfs: forced extent alignment John Garry
2024-03-06 17:52 ` John Garry
2024-03-06 20:54 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-13 18:32 ` John Garry
2024-03-06 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] fs: xfs: Make file data allocations observe the 'forcealign' flag John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] fs: xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] fs: xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign John Garry
2024-03-06 21:07 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 11:38 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] fs: iomap: Sub-extent zeroing John Garry
2024-03-06 21:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-07 11:51 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] fs: xfs: " John Garry
2024-03-06 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 12:57 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] fs: xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign John Garry
2024-03-06 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 12:42 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] fs: xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-03-06 21:31 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 10:35 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] fs: xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-03-06 21:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 10:19 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] fs: xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-03-06 21:33 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 11:55 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZejcyPPX3bVdvJyV@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbongio@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox