From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Sam Sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix log recovery buffer allocation for the legacy h_size fixup
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:18:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zi-QD8IdNCFHOyu7@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429070200.1586537-2-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:01:58AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Commit a70f9fe52daa ("xfs: detect and handle invalid iclog size set by
> mkfs") added a fixup for incorrect h_size values used for the initial
> umount record in old xfsprogs versions. But it is not using this fixed
> up value to size the log recovery buffer, which can lead to an out of
> bounds access when the incorrect h_size does not come from the old mkfs
> tool, but a fuzzer.
>
> Fix this by open coding xlog_logrec_hblks and taking the fixed h_size
> into account for this calculation.
>
> Fixes: a70f9fe52daa ("xfs: detect and handle invalid iclog size set by mkfs")
> Reported-by: Sam Sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
The commit log/fixes tag are incorrect... xlog_logrec_hblks() didn't
exist at the time a70f9fe52daa was committed. I suspect this broke later
in commit 0c771b99d6c9 ("xfs: clean up calculation of LR header
blocks"), but please double check.
Otherwise the code changes look fine to me, so with the commit log fixed
up:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index b445e8ce4a7d21..bb8957927c3c2e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -2999,7 +2999,7 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(
> int error = 0, h_size, h_len;
> int error2 = 0;
> int bblks, split_bblks;
> - int hblks, split_hblks, wrapped_hblks;
> + int hblks = 1, split_hblks, wrapped_hblks;
> int i;
> struct hlist_head rhash[XLOG_RHASH_SIZE];
> LIST_HEAD (buffer_list);
> @@ -3055,14 +3055,22 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(
> if (error)
> goto bread_err1;
>
> - hblks = xlog_logrec_hblks(log, rhead);
> - if (hblks != 1) {
> - kvfree(hbp);
> - hbp = xlog_alloc_buffer(log, hblks);
> + /*
> + * This open codes xlog_logrec_hblks so that we can reuse the
> + * fixed up h_size value calculated above. Without that we'd
> + * still allocate the buffer based on the incorrect on-disk
> + * size.
> + */
> + if (h_size > XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE &&
> + (rhead->h_version & cpu_to_be32(XLOG_VERSION_2))) {
> + hblks = DIV_ROUND_UP(h_size, XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE);
> + if (hblks > 1) {
> + kvfree(hbp);
> + hbp = xlog_alloc_buffer(log, hblks);
> + }
> }
> } else {
> ASSERT(log->l_sectBBsize == 1);
> - hblks = 1;
> hbp = xlog_alloc_buffer(log, 1);
> h_size = XLOG_BIG_RECORD_BSIZE;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 7:01 fix h_size validation Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-29 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix log recovery buffer allocation for the legacy h_size fixup Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-29 12:18 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-04-29 17:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-29 15:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-29 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: restrict the h_size fixup in xlog_do_recovery_pass Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-29 12:18 ` Brian Foster
2024-04-29 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-30 10:59 ` Brian Foster
2024-05-10 12:34 ` Brian Foster
2024-04-29 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-29 7:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: clean up buffer allocation " Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-29 12:18 ` Brian Foster
2024-04-29 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zi-QD8IdNCFHOyu7@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samsun1006219@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).