From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
chandanbabu@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: improve truncate on a realtime inode with huge extsize
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 06:46:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlnUorFO2Ptz5gcq@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529095206.2568162-9-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
> +/*
> + * Decide if this file is a realtime file whose data allocation unit is larger
> + * than default.
> + */
> +static inline bool xfs_inode_has_hugertalloc(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> +
> + return XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) &&
> + mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize > XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, XFS_DFL_RTEXTSIZE);
> +}
The default rtextsize is actually a single FSB unless we're on a striped
volume in which case it is increased.
I'll take care of removing the unused and confusing XFS_DFL_RTEXTSIZE,
but for this patch we'd need to know the trade-off of when to just
convert to unwritten. For single-fsb rtextents we obviously don't need
any special action. But do you see a slowdown when converting to
unwritten for small > 1 rtextsizes? Because if not we could just
always use that code path, which would significantly simplify things
and remove yet another different to test code path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 9:51 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:51 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] iomap: zeroing needs to be pagecache aware Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:44 ` Brian Foster
2024-05-31 15:43 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-02 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-02 11:04 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03 9:07 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-03 14:37 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-04 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] math64: add rem_u64() to just return the remainder Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] iomap: pass blocksize to iomap_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-02 11:16 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03 13:23 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] fsdax: pass blocksize to dax_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: refactor the truncating order Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 13:51 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 15:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-03 14:15 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-02 22:46 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-03 14:18 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of realtime inode Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 14:35 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: reserve blocks for truncating " Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: improve truncate on a realtime inode with huge extsize Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-05-31 14:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-04 7:09 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 7:38 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlnUorFO2Ptz5gcq@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox