From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: zlang@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] generic/717: remove obsolete check
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:09:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnJ2Ehz8PIcQ5m6R@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171867145359.793463.11533521582429286273.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:47:48PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> The latest draft of the EXCHANGERANGE ioctl has dropped the flag that
> enforced that the two files being operated upon were exactly the same
> length as was specified in the ioctl parameters. Remove this check
> since it's now defunct.
The last draft is what got merged into 6.10-rc as far as I can tell,
so maybe update the commit message for that?
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 0:46 [PATCHSET v30.6 2/6] fstests: atomic file updates Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 01/10] misc: split swapext and exchangerange Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 02/10] misc: change xfs_io -c swapext to exchangerange Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 03/10] generic/710: repurpose this for exchangerange vs. quota testing Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 17:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20 19:06 ` Zorro Lang
2024-06-20 19:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 04/10] generic/717: remove obsolete check Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-06-19 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20 18:58 ` Zorro Lang
2024-06-18 0:48 ` [PATCH 05/10] ltp/{fsstress,fsx}: make the exchangerange naming consistent Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:48 ` [PATCH 06/10] misc: flip HAVE_XFS_IOC_EXCHANGE_RANGE logic Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:48 ` [PATCH 07/10] src/fiexchange.h: update XFS_IOC_EXCHANGE_RANGE definitions Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:48 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs/122: fix for exchrange conversion Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs/206: screen out exchange-range from golden output Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??) Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 16:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20 4:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnJ2Ehz8PIcQ5m6R@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox