linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"bfoster@redhat.com" <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@kernel.org" <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: enable WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on m_sync_workqueue
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 23:37:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZojmMx7ERcBJMQ1j@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZojggALtQ3kqaJJo@infradead.org>

Btw, one issue with using direct I/O is that need to synchronize with
page cache access from the server itself.  For pNFS we can do that as
we track outstanding layouts.  Without layouts it will be more work
as we'll need a different data structure tracking grant for bypassing
the server.  Or just piggy back on layouts anyway as that's what they
are doing.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-06  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28 16:18 [RFC PATCH] xfs: enable WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on m_sync_workqueue Mike Snitzer
2024-06-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Snitzer
2024-06-30 23:46   ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-01  4:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 23:51       ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-03 11:29       ` NeilBrown
2024-07-03 14:15         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 23:02           ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-09 23:12           ` NeilBrown
2024-07-11 11:55             ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-01 14:13     ` Mike Snitzer
2024-07-02 12:33       ` Trond Myklebust
2024-07-02 13:04         ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-02 14:00           ` Trond Myklebust
2024-07-02 23:15             ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-06  0:32             ` NeilBrown
2024-07-06  6:13               ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-06  6:37                 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-07-09 23:39                   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZojmMx7ERcBJMQ1j@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).