Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: add XFS_ITEM_UNSAFE for log item push return result

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 08:00:05PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hence the only cases where the item might have been already removed
> from the AIL by the ->iop_push() are those where the push itself
> removes the item from the AIL. This only occurs in shutdown
> situations, so it's not the common case.
> 
> In which case, returning XFS_ITEM_FREED to tell the push code that
> it was freed and should not reference it at all is fine. We don't
> really even need tracing for this case because if the items can't be
> removed from the AIL, they will leave some other AIL trace when
> pushe (i.e.  they will be stuck locked, pinned or flushing and those
> will leave traces...)

So XFS_ITEM_FREED is definitively a better name, but it still feels
a bit fragile that any of these shutdown paths need special handling
inside ->iop_push.