public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>,
	djwong@kernel.org, chandanbabu@kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: add XFS_ITEM_UNSAFE for log item push return result
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:23:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zs6mRe5o_zndtwM_@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zs5KsPEBZFkzG2Pb@dread.disaster.area>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I suspect that we'd do better to have explicit shutdown processing
> of log items in the AIL (i.e. a ->iop_shutdown method) that is
> called instead of ->iop_push when the AIL detects that the
> filesystem has shut down. We can then define the exact behaviour we
> want in this case and processing does not have to be non-blocking
> for performance and latency reasons.
> 
> If we go down that route, I think we'd want to add a
> XFS_ITEM_SHUTDOWN return value after the push code calls
> xfs_force_shutdown(). The push code does not error out the item or
> remove it from the AIL, just shuts down the fs and returns
> XFS_ITEM_SHUTDOWN.

Yes, that seems even better.  But it would probably be a fair amount
of work.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-23 11:04 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: fix and cleanups for log item push Long Li
2024-08-23 11:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove redundant set null for ip->i_itemp Long Li
2024-08-23 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-25  4:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 11:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: ensuere deleting item from AIL after shutdown in dquot flush Long Li
2024-08-23 17:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-24  3:08     ` Long Li
2024-08-27  9:40     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-31 13:45       ` Long Li
2024-08-23 11:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: add XFS_ITEM_UNSAFE for log item push return result Long Li
2024-08-23 17:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-24  3:30     ` Long Li
2024-08-27  9:44     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-24  3:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27  9:41     ` Long Li
2024-08-27 10:00     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-27 12:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 21:52         ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-28  4:23           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-08-29 10:16             ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-23 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: fix a UAF when dquot item push Long Li
2024-08-23 17:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-24  2:03     ` Long Li
2024-08-23 11:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: fix a UAF when inode " Long Li
2024-08-23 17:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27  8:14     ` Long Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zs6mRe5o_zndtwM_@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox