From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] generic: test to run fsx eof pollution
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:07:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsyMI-yNdZkoQt9g@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822205430.GX865349@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:54:30PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:44:22AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Filesystem regressions related to partial page zeroing can go
> > unnoticed for a decent amount of time. A recent example is the issue
> > of iomap zero range not handling dirty pagecache over unwritten
> > extents, which leads to wrong behavior on certain file extending
> > operations (i.e. truncate, write extension, etc.).
> >
> > fsx does occasionally uncover these sorts of problems, but failures
> > can be rare and/or require longer running tests outside what is
> > typically run via full fstests regression runs. fsx now supports a
> > mode that injects post-eof data in order to explicitly test partial
> > eof zeroing behavior. This uncovers certain problems more quickly
> > and applies coverage more broadly across size changing operations.
> >
> > Add a new test that runs an fsx instance (modeled after generic/127)
> > with eof pollution mode enabled. While the test is generic, it is
> > currently limited to XFS as that is currently the only known major
> > fs that does enough zeroing to satisfy the strict semantics expected
> > by fsx. The long term goal is to uncover and fix issues so more
> > filesystems can enable this test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/generic/362 | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/generic/362.out | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/generic/362
> > create mode 100644 tests/generic/362.out
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/362 b/tests/generic/362
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..30870cd0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/362
> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2024 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FSQA Test No. 362
> > +#
> > +# Run fsx with EOF pollution enabled. This provides test coverage for partial
> > +# EOF page/block zeroing for operations that change file size.
> > +#
> > +
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest rw auto
> > +
> > +FSX_FILE_SIZE=262144
> > +# on failure, replace -q with -d to see post-eof writes in the dump output
> > +FSX_ARGS="-q -l $FSX_FILE_SIZE -e 1 -N 100000"
> > +
> > +_require_test
> > +
> > +# currently only xfs performs enough zeroing to satisfy fsx
> > +_supported_fs xfs
>
> Should get rid of this. ;)
>
Agreed. But just to be clear, I was planning to leave this in for now so
we don't have to go and fix the various other filesystem issues
(assuming various maintainers agree) as a gate to fixing iomap zeroing
and having decent test coverage. I'm planning to look into the other
failures once I get through the iomap revalidation thing to avoid the
flush on XFS.
> > +ltp/fsx $FSX_ARGS $FSX_AVOID $TEST_DIR/fsx.$seq > $tmp.output 2>&1
>
> I wonder, is there a reason not to use run_fsx from common/rc?
>
At first glance the only thing that stands out to me is run_fsx
hardcodes the file to $TEST_DIR/junk instead of using and leaving around
a test-specific file. I find that ever so slightly annoying, but not
enough to hardcode the fsx command in the test, so I'll make that
change.
My initial hope was to be able to just turn on the eof pollution thing
by default and rely on existing fstests to (which I've confirmed do)
detect the iomap zeroing problems, but the other non-iomap fs failures
mean we can't do that without being disruptive and hence the need for
the custom fstest. If we can get to the point of completely removing the
_supported_fs check above, then perhaps we could also revisit changing
the fsx default and removing this test.
> Otherwise this looks ok to me.
>
Thanks for the comments.
Brian
> --D
>
> > +cat $tmp.output
> > +
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/362.out b/tests/generic/362.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..7af6b96a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/362.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 362
> > +All 100000 operations completed A-OK!
> > --
> > 2.45.0
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 14:44 [PATCH 0/3] fstests/fsx: test coverage for eof zeroing Brian Foster
2024-08-22 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] fsx: factor out a file size update helper Brian Foster
2024-08-22 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-26 14:03 ` Brian Foster
2024-08-26 17:10 ` Brian Foster
2024-08-22 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] fsx: support eof page pollution for eof zeroing test coverage Brian Foster
2024-08-22 20:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-26 14:04 ` Brian Foster
2024-08-22 14:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] generic: test to run fsx eof pollution Brian Foster
2024-08-22 20:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-26 14:07 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsyMI-yNdZkoQt9g@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox