public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: MottiKumar Babu <mottikumarbabu@gmail.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, chandanbabu@kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, zhangjiachen.jaycee@bytedance.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, anupnewsmail@gmail.com,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix out-of-bounds access in xfs_bmapi_allocate by validating whichfork
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 01:46:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zx9PTso9Me5es7He@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241027193541.14212-1-mottikumarbabu@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:05:27AM +0530, MottiKumar Babu wrote:
> This issue was reported by Coverity Scan.
> 
> Report:
> CID 1633175 Out-of-bounds access - Access of memory not owned by this buffer may cause crashes or incorrect computations.
> In xfs_bmapi_allocate: Out-of-bounds access to a buffer (CWE-119)
> 
> Signed-off-by: MottiKumar Babu <mottikumarbabu@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 36dd08d13293..6ff378d2d3d9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4169,6 +4169,10 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
>  		 * is not on the busy list.
>  		 */
>  		bma->datatype = XFS_ALLOC_NOBUSY;
> +		// Ensure whichfork is valid (0 or 1) before further checks
> +		if (whichfork < 0 || whichfork > 1) {
> +			return -EINVAL; // Invalid fork

How is this supposed to happen?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-28  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-27 19:35 [PATCH] Fix out-of-bounds access in xfs_bmapi_allocate by validating whichfork MottiKumar Babu
2024-10-27 20:32 ` [PATCH] Follow-up on Submitted Patch: Fix out-of-bounds access in xfs_bmapi_allocate MottiKumar Babu
2024-10-27 22:53 ` [PATCH] Fix out-of-bounds access in xfs_bmapi_allocate by validating whichfork Dave Chinner
2024-10-28  8:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-01  3:36 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zx9PTso9Me5es7He@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=anupnewsmail@gmail.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mottikumarbabu@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=zhangjiachen.jaycee@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox