From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2839618952C for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732093518; cv=none; b=JD9GjG9PMVv9ESLeJRVs7HWV6xfUuxsc/TvnBBTfZXQhesUmGeqzonJgbv5gMtq06spHWeebbp61u24Xyw2OsSpKZ86nw5ttwdS68KI0fM0Y/pQ4xtk/hUFiTrqeK8r2A8Hw1g1zphKfDj9YBR2QPERwnrPeY0S3sQhgsH8bWZE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732093518; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V0j4glC442/92T/jE36E7dLQiw7JYe43suk63IbLQXo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GrOkxu5LczYAY0l8ws42mH8eWqupXXwBALaJI4Hp0CxxFH2GwNVSeMM6J8hssBu8hL1gPFl9z+IKEFf0sP6vi0FX8khcR5zqfxA2ghUYRjLdlqGF2CygZeRFmMwOuwWN/VEtL6MLLaGWe33Fzblqje4N65+mobMfdVlRoolRELU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=c118t83n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="c118t83n" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=RzDdM4gaJCYZcne1MAulL+tXV6rEVQPjLiSPRURZ+74=; b=c118t83nJi6+Hiib6gxnJ76ha+ Sz+eFEjjl7L4U6iQkYbHCQoV6HRHYqJhvOmdLimTxxosgrINIcGkzN+0/XGeG5AJaXzftDDJXnvmI vy6P0JnDk7T1TDbl+fy5AR0JqGA19WZNf7LrFbF1iFmK5kHMaiLz+W0TtSdAJ41VKyz+CZhlM62sE BQ2cfCRilHCPH5HqbtJSvsAm3x1BxnTcz91iGjbLHLQ+JZITZkKmlyGbTIc1Y20f6NDjD3EtUFMpK a57NVRJPqYSj0gYrVdP5/0hKFV1+py0GjBiK8M7yeH/a4kBtFd6hordlLzJYiFo58gWdK3BZxsAG4 giMbMazg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tDgeC-0000000Eqib-1iUy; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:05:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 01:05:16 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Long Li , brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes Message-ID: References: <20241113091907.56937-1-leo.lilong@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > IOW following the train of thought in the other subthread, would any > practical workload be affected if we just trimmed io_size when needed by > i_size and left it at that? Can you explain what you mean with that?