From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17902309B6; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 05:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732168233; cv=none; b=mgXvfxi6F6u4lKkAd8w8Tod0MqCJWi875QKyGJBkrl2JBnaveRwE8f+0wOMR6vUi9D7XMkE7fDIzPN8AI/9QzTUPTDYSd4E+3lq4FAnp2lHTFoNeUqWjkvTdhE1rVaefZwbPX9Qn95fIKR/FU+Abtq/f3Ksp0nACW5Bv2z6Ge94= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732168233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nvXfyViqS8LCLM00OqtDJk/QnbYHncc30lID0GCtAu0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l3s0HPuwgNEvbSj2FcPo1JDCMN0lWIklQEexY+OgbXELu78OZ8r3OnGjDVOgmBEPu94YKLMsVd5q5rz/lGKQ60zfnqhhBZMgXiL44YuYX3FTqHGCzzyedZvK7vve4DktNT8i8e+iS3vzp6kTT6SszpY475HDOCP7eSiFuFIVbJs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=pp7kSXHu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pp7kSXHu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=cJDKVtehceYdWBkDKuNTF/7o+fpaX41PEifjB2anWfc=; b=pp7kSXHujb2fm3981IiuEa5pDB fFfaf+3OO2FBTtuIhsQkeO72uwM3Erj/9zBtPG9hcRGAHhj84LVMkRxR91yoOhU8invWHbvAMdqBK gD01mw4PqZAiWy5WANaaVzMmndyoAdNvp7lNPSwhPIQPIpi+ylCd05kPmXqCpKKy2D/Ps1L9VaUM7 cvkNmfMkVJTsmasmQAlWY9VBi+rfUcCRu6nj4qNihjPKaxe6bcSHRMxhOD8DnNJNrTlqB8WUUl+CR wW1THFJsrrdf6wQwUfj3QHUPYxdvaH8M10nOi+5F/twIP1rTnd7lbFcIj8NYhFWTiZdkte3XR6OdP gE8a4s9Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tE05H-0000000GsnL-1UHz; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 05:50:31 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:50:31 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] iomap: zero range folio batch processing prototype Message-ID: References: <20241119154656.774395-1-bfoster@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 09:29:17AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > helper, I just wasn't aware that some things were already doing that to > poke at the iter. Thanks. > > I'm assuming we'd want this to be a dynamic allocation as well, since > folio_batch is fairly large in comparison (256b compared to 208b > iomap_iter). Or at least only add a pointer to it in the iter and then point to a separate stack allocation for it.