From: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <cem@kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<david@fromorbit.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<houtao1@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove unknown compat feature check in superblock write validation
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:14:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzFon-0VbKscbGMT@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241109162124.GA9438@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 08:21:24AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 03:38:55PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> >
> > Friendly Ping ...
>
> Sorry about that, I missed this one.
>
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > Compat features are new features that older kernels can safely ignore,
> > > allowing read-write mounts without issues. The current sb write validation
> > > implementation returns -EFSCORRUPTED for unknown compat features,
> > > preventing filesystem write operations and contradicting the feature's
> > > definition.
> > >
> > > Additionally, if the mounted image is unclean, the log recovery may need
> > > to write to the superblock. Returning an error for unknown compat features
> > > during sb write validation can cause mount failures.
> > >
> > > Although XFS currently does not use compat feature flags, this issue
> > > affects current kernels' ability to mount images that may use compat
> > > feature flags in the future.
> > >
> > > Since superblock read validation already warns about unknown compat
> > > features, it's unnecessary to repeat this warning during write validation.
> > > Therefore, the relevant code in write validation is being removed.
> > >
>
> You might want to add this so it actually gets backported:
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19
>
Thanks for your review, indeed, it should backport to v4.19+.
> > > Fixes: 9e037cb7972f ("xfs: check for unknown v5 feature bits in superblock write verifier")
> > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
>
> Makes sense, so
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> --D
>
> > > ---
> > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 7 -------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > index d95409f3cba6..02ebcbc4882f 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > @@ -297,13 +297,6 @@ xfs_validate_sb_write(
> > > * the kernel cannot support since we checked for unsupported bits in
> > > * the read verifier, which means that memory is corrupt.
> > > */
> > > - if (xfs_sb_has_compat_feature(sbp, XFS_SB_FEAT_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> > > - xfs_warn(mp,
> > > -"Corruption detected in superblock compatible features (0x%x)!",
> > > - (sbp->sb_features_compat & XFS_SB_FEAT_COMPAT_UNKNOWN));
> > > - return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > if (!xfs_is_readonly(mp) &&
> > > xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(sbp, XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
> > > xfs_alert(mp,
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 1:25 [PATCH] xfs: remove unknown compat feature check in superblock write validation Long Li
2024-11-09 7:38 ` Long Li
2024-11-09 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11 2:14 ` Long Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzFon-0VbKscbGMT@localhost.localdomain \
--to=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox