From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64FFB1E5B85 for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 05:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747114428; cv=none; b=N4ThbV4zapHQti2YokSYjre8YUKfeLHv07EqtrTpKTWN8nbnZ4pfo6UmqoeduvcHKm+AUaeDtB/rwdMH4XIn11fony5mSTEBr+3DvpRmU0KU/X/K79/yeEB6ZQlo45nEzpuStPpGcD2RB58F9uwvMhmurNmr9ADc8jVjRxxLdPY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747114428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mo79ZvUPWP7mLbGcSiGYZlXetR6/YfEHLVj03TWIAaU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gMkzXifTcVGqKkCQrMNOwFGEn6CtceE3plEGEb4A9EVHEC5a8fcGXvYa4lnGUXwUsi5GoSjvxkSiMead1V4iP4rhnTVMjXyo1Ss/882TaEi1kRFP4sGm5114dNqVdwy8SmXR/P9NKx6wbwluK2afU5fD6A1QTkABjHzA/LYIDsY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=0gZrn0tD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="0gZrn0tD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mo79ZvUPWP7mLbGcSiGYZlXetR6/YfEHLVj03TWIAaU=; b=0gZrn0tDVd6PKBE8Z65Mj3cR87 eW4zN/oseoWeOZ0ykZCYY3ULRj3Y1d+4RWQ+fjq6hwNj88kORIaw3ztphJAjCN0Gu0hazAxuoD3Np Bt2O2FmsJThI9mQlrDclZjVLzNxFtNkEJSLpe2Nsq1RlsJcWAmE4TfADuj+d0iBYEnp/RZPmYEgAQ 4inEylo3THIesis4vFsYs57TNGpFVRMVD31JqYC/u+AEhCPw6rRkh/zfFjVQIZ+XP9Yx1Zltj/LtE dk+swIg8S6XXwEsqi0Hjlrm2KDEJXF1tYS9YVvcbNesRILMdIYcafOFe771LHNKt83sIARjlASQEP nazVg/Sg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uEiGw-0000000BOtE-1bT1; Tue, 13 May 2025 05:33:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 22:33:46 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Daniel Gomez , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Gomez , Pankaj Raghav , gost.dev@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: use stx_blksize for dev block size by default Message-ID: References: <20250206-min-io-default-blocksize-v1-1-2312e0bb8809@samsung.com> <323gt6bngrysa3i6nzgih6golhs3wovawnn5chjcrkegajinw7@fxdjlji5xbxb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 07:27:24AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > So this should just be repsined with this just stat blocksize? No, as mentioned before the entire approach is incorrect.