[ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to f259584cb40c

[ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to f259584cb40c

[Carlos Maiolino]

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs-linux repository at:

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git

has just been updated.

Patches often get missed, so please check if your outstanding patches
were in this update. If they have not been in this update, please
resubmit them to linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org so they can be picked up in
the next update.

The new head of the for-next branch is commit:

f259584cb40c Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into for-next

21 new commits:

Carlos Maiolino (1):
      [f259584cb40c] Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into for-next

Dave Chinner (7):
      [09234a632be4] xfs: xfs_ifree_cluster vs xfs_iflush_shutdown_abort deadlock
      [db6a2274162d] xfs: catch stale AGF/AGF metadata
      [d62016b1a2df] xfs: avoid dquot buffer pin deadlock
      [fc48627b9c22] xfs: add tracepoints for stale pinned inode state debug
      [d2fe5c4c8d25] xfs: rearrange code in xfs_buf_item.c
      [816c330b605c] xfs: factor out stale buffer item completion
      [7b5f775be14a] xfs: fix unmount hang with unflushable inodes stuck in the AIL

Steven Rostedt (13):
      [c0ed3d33cea1] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_attr_remove_iter_return
      [4b1b26f4fded] xfs: remove unused event xlog_iclog_want_sync
      [159e1d454d6d] xfs: remove unused event xfs_ioctl_clone
      [1905a13e44d9] xfs: remove unused xfs_reflink_compare_extents events
      [3a81e9a6d78d] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_attr_rmtval_set
      [3f9b08fedc35] xfs: remove unused xfs_attr events
      [9e6d839093cb] xfs: remove unused event xfs_attr_node_removename
      [6f4d1600b0ba] xfs: remove unused event xfs_alloc_near_error
      [7352e1419858] xfs: remove unused event xfs_alloc_near_nominleft
      [4b7169eb63ab] xfs: remove unused event xfs_pagecache_inval
      [5a3b36801c7d] xfs: remove usused xfs_end_io_direct events
      [8f648ef996bf] xfs: only create event xfs_file_compat_ioctl when CONFIG_COMPAT is configure
      [9075fe1225ad] xfs: change xfs_xattr_class from a TRACE_EVENT() to DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()

Code Diffstat:

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c  |  41 +++++--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c |  31 ++++-
 fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h       |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c           |  38 ------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h           |   1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c      | 295 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h      |   3 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c         |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c        |   8 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c         |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c    |   5 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c       |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c            |  86 +++----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h         |  78 ++----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c         |   4 +-
 15 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to f259584cb40c

[Christoph Hellwig]

Btw, I assumed you'd send my fixes from three weeks ago to Linus for
6.16.   Do you plan to wait for 6.17 or did you just not get around
sending a pull request?  At least for the zone allocator shutdown
check that would be annoying as it causes hangs during testing.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to f259584cb40c

[Carlos Maiolino]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:58:08AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, I assumed you'd send my fixes from three weeks ago to Linus for
> 6.16.   Do you plan to wait for 6.17 or did you just not get around
> sending a pull request?  At least for the zone allocator shutdown
> check that would be annoying as it causes hangs during testing.
> 

You meant the ones we already have in for-next? Or did I miss something
else?

I'll send them for 6.16, I was just really busy past couple weeks to
actually prepare a Pull request.

I'm planning to send everything we have now in for-next to Linus on next
week. I can send a pull tomorrow with things already staged for a few
days (i.e. without the patches from today) if you need it urgently, but
I'd rather wait to send it to -rc5 if that's ok with you.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to f259584cb40c

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:58:08AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Btw, I assumed you'd send my fixes from three weeks ago to Linus for
> > 6.16.   Do you plan to wait for 6.17 or did you just not get around
> > sending a pull request?  At least for the zone allocator shutdown
> > check that would be annoying as it causes hangs during testing.
> > 
> 
> You meant the ones we already have in for-next?

Yes.

> I'll send them for 6.16,

Awesome, I kjust wanted to double check.

> I'm planning to send everything we have now in for-next to Linus on next
> week. I can send a pull tomorrow with things already staged for a few
> days (i.e. without the patches from today) if you need it urgently, but
> I'd rather wait to send it to -rc5 if that's ok with you.

In general I'd like to see them out rather sooner than later, but
if it's easier for your it can wait.