* Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors
[not found] ` <aJU0scj_dR8_37S8@kbusch-mbp>
@ 2025-08-11 10:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-08-11 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Keith Busch, linux-block, linux-fsdevel,
linux-kernel, snitzer, axboe, dw, brauner, linux-xfs
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 05:20:17PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> Sure. I wrote up some for blktest, and the same test works as-is for
> filesystems too. Potential question: where do such programs go
> (xfstests, blktests, both, or some common place)?
We currently have no good way to share tests between xfstest and
blktests, so I think it would require duplicating the helper programs.
> I tested on loop, nvme, and virtio-blk, both raw block (blktests) and
> xfs (fstests). Seems fine.
Cool. I'd like the hear from the other XFS folks if the possibility
of easily introducing preallocated space (that's what it looks like on
disk) for writes failed because of wrong alignment is fine. Given that
the same user could introduce them using fallocate it's definitively not
a security issue, but also rather unusual and unexpected. And from the
other file system maintainers if they have similar issues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-08-11 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20250805141123.332298-1-kbusch@meta.com>
[not found] ` <aJNr9svJav0DgZ-E@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <aJU0scj_dR8_37S8@kbusch-mbp>
2025-08-11 10:32 ` [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).