From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E56A27FB12 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756108280; cv=none; b=hzkvZEQlLJEdvqI8vBssH1q1IQALsyJrYUG+p1aARDr71Hi3QRCd8LQEVnZ3y83uXxeuv85utOE8K+ktZh8rNiXBRhgi8aKxhhWe6PV7WF6qlUK+fpOrN3wQYUqVPmgeHx+e47YzPN8038c7fw/6gijBsoaI0woYrQSwTFJmG0M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756108280; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HqzIipNZMewAMLp0aFKwRT1c48es5wM/vsJVSxdr/4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=imMxDoNHjVP6zm8uDpOO5FBJGo3G0R9S3xN4DL2/yXjawNdgCamcr9JndlPe7j1X3w+/gRR0mfd/Rqpn4J4Pn3HTxfdsxh7DgRBIqcwKg7Hgazyo++1wYbygmV9PASnzroKFrFd/x2XF/FggJTy2dGnkzB+8sGMsm9EJky/WRqE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=GM/4y67w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GM/4y67w" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kw3ULxlR/nAAjZh0Pk7ykEuUgVOWXK1oZDa0wXm+mow=; b=GM/4y67w5W86Z0+XjClsNu1zaC DxziAaJNFUq9k0f9dP71Nx8rD23IT6oxAmRQnz61hc7oIp0fGsAxDcO61twPf61r6f6Sw4q7m3YSH v/3O01MADpKUIQoyJAsGshZmVCFPR5VOEGbkYePDLkPOqXsjKlNggQrxx9tRAzKxGNIjw875lV4rJ QP23ZPjctWpVouyrLQrV/UGvdpb7DYRJ9MrBDVTk1sXmvrWAh6P4bwePTR2NKXqHNF0JrVsOFOA7X XNIXWgZ0BoflEF4Me1HuuM8wjBjm4ZBhHBoVjw7EMVrqUeQB39RiDDFAf2ZCoYBzVQWini6QvbTpr cT7wX8HA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uqRz2-00000007Dhj-1wyH; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:51:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:51:16 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Eric Sandeen , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , Donald Douwsma Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] xfs: remap block layer ENODATA read errors to EIO Message-ID: References: <1bd13475-3154-4ab4-8930-2c8cdc295829@redhat.com> <573177fd-202d-4853-b0d1-c7b7d9bbf2f2@sandeen.net> <0d424258-e1ba-47c3-a0ae-60e241ca3c7c@sandeen.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0d424258-e1ba-47c3-a0ae-60e241ca3c7c@sandeen.net> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:38:54AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Ok, this is getting a little more complex. The ENODATA problem is > very specific, and has (oddly) been reported by users/customers twice > in recent days. That's probably when you started deploying a kernel to them that contained a backport of 07120f1abdff80f3d1351f733661abe28d609535 Author: Allison Collins Date: Mon Jul 20 21:47:22 2020 -0700 xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines which added this check. So anything fixing that should probably add a Fixes tag, even if that commit only made the issue show up and did not actually cause it.