linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	brauner@kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, djwong@kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] iomap: track pending read bytes more optimally
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:21:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPu1ilw6Tq6tKPrf@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnrk1b3bHYhbW9q0r4A0NjnMNEbtCFExosAL_rUoBupr1mO3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 09:25:13AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> What I missed was that if all the bytes in the folio are non-uptodate
> and need to read in by the filesystem, then there's a bug where the
> read will be ended on the folio twice (in iomap_read_end() and when
> the filesystem calls iomap_finish_folio_write(), when only the
> filesystem should end the read), which does 2 folio unlocks which ends
> up locking the folio. Looking at the writeback patch that does a
> similar optimization [1], I miss the same thing there.

folio_unlock() contains:
        VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);

Feels like more filesystem people should be enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
when testing (excluding performance testing of course; it'll do ugly
things to your performance numbers).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26  0:25 [PATCH v5 00/14] fuse: use iomap for buffered reads + readahead Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] iomap: move bio read logic into helper function Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] iomap: move read/readahead bio submission " Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] iomap: store read/readahead bio generically Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] iomap: iterate over folio mapping in iomap_readpage_iter() Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] iomap: rename iomap_readpage_iter() to iomap_read_folio_iter() Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] iomap: rename iomap_readpage_ctx struct to iomap_read_folio_ctx Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] iomap: track pending read bytes more optimally Joanne Koong
2025-10-23 19:34   ` Brian Foster
2025-10-24  0:01     ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 16:25       ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 17:14         ` Brian Foster
2025-10-24 19:48           ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 21:55             ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-27 12:16               ` Brian Foster
2025-10-24 17:21         ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-10-24 19:22           ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 20:59             ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-10-24 21:37               ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-24 21:58               ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] iomap: set accurate iter->pos when reading folio ranges Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] iomap: add caller-provided callbacks for read and readahead Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] iomap: move buffered io bio logic into new file Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] iomap: make iomap_read_folio() a void return Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] fuse: use iomap for read_folio Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] fuse: use iomap for readahead Joanne Koong
2025-09-26  0:26 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] fuse: remove fc->blkbits workaround for partial writes Joanne Koong
2025-09-29  9:38 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] fuse: use iomap for buffered reads + readahead Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPu1ilw6Tq6tKPrf@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).